The term data linking means connecting different datasets from health, human services, and social programs to form a more complete and useful view of patient and population health. In the U.S., many people, especially vulnerable groups such as children in foster care or those on Medicaid and other assistance programs, get services from several agencies. However, these data often remain separated, which limits their usefulness and creates inefficiencies.
Research shows that about one in three children in the U.S. take part in multiple health and human services programs, including Medicaid, child welfare, and nutrition assistance. When data from these programs is separated, it can cause duplicated efforts, inaccurate billing, and missed chances to address patient needs in a comprehensive way. Uncoordinated data may lead to double billing, duplicate treatments, and neglect of social factors affecting health outcomes.
Linked administrative data allows organizations to improve oversight by spotting duplicate billing, cutting down fraud, and better distributing resources. States like Florida and Kentucky have successfully linked Medicaid claims and child welfare records to uncover untreated psychiatric and substance use disorders among caregivers. This data connection helped target interventions that improved patient care and supported family stability. Likewise, Iowa uses linked data to monitor psychotropic drug prescriptions for foster children, checking for patterns of multiple prescribing that might signal inappropriate use.
One main advantage of linking health and human services data is offering patients and families clearer information about their care options and outcomes. Data transparency helps individuals make better and more personalized healthcare decisions, promoting a patient-centered approach. Studies have found that administrative data, which is usually more accurate and less biased than self-reported surveys, provides a strong basis for research that supports decision aids, health education, and policy planning.
Still, there are challenges in accessing clear and integrated health information. Limited communication between providers, agencies, and patients can prevent patients from fully understanding their treatment choices, financial responsibilities, and potential outcomes. Linking databases not only brings information together but also creates opportunities for better communication between healthcare providers and patients, which recent efforts like Healthy People 2030 emphasize.
Healthy People 2030, run by the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, highlights health literacy as a key goal. It focuses on helping people find, understand, and use health information effectively. By linking data, organizations can offer patients comprehensive yet clear information, enabling thoughtful decisions based on personal values and situations. For example, decision aids created by the University of North Carolina use integrated administrative, clinical, billing, and patient data to identify eligible patients and deliver educational materials. This approach combines mail outreach with in-clinic support, leading to greater patient engagement and knowledge.
Linking data affects the administrative and operational side of healthcare delivery. Medical practice administrators and IT managers responsible for information systems must consider clinical outcomes as well as workflow efficiency, financial controls, and privacy compliance.
Linked data can simplify service delivery by detecting overlapping services or duplicate spending in public programs. For instance, Wyoming’s effort to remove duplicate billing between Medicaid and child welfare through linked data saved money and improved service reliability. Washington state created the Integrated Client Database, pooling data from 10 agencies to support cost-benefit analysis and better operational decisions across areas. Indiana’s Management Performance Hub connects 17 datasets to tackle public health issues such as high infant mortality, improving Medicaid use and transportation safety.
For healthcare organizations managing government programs, detecting and stopping fraud is important. Linked data allows analysts to compare claims and service reports, uncovering discrepancies that isolated datasets might miss. This inter-agency data connection strengthens accountability and audit processes, benefiting both financial management and patient care quality.
Creating linked data systems requires cooperation across organizational boundaries. Issues related to data ownership, privacy, security, and laws can slow progress. Successful projects use clear data use agreements, strong stakeholder cooperation, and modern IT systems designed for secure and repeatable data sharing. For example, the ASPE-led Child and Caregiver Outcomes Using Linked Data (CCOULD) project in Florida and Kentucky brings together multiple partners to tackle these challenges.
As healthcare organizations adopt linked data systems, technology like artificial intelligence (AI) and workflow automation plays a key role in managing the complexity of combined information.
AI tools can automate linking datasets by finding matching records, even when data fields vary or are incomplete. Machine learning helps improve accuracy in patient matching, fraud detection, and predicting outcomes. Automation reduces manual errors, shortens processing times, and makes linked data more reliable.
Additionally, AI supports advanced analysis such as predictive modeling, helping administrators forecast resource needs or patient risks based on data trends. For instance, AI on linked data can identify children at greater risk for negative pediatric or foster care outcomes, allowing for early intervention.
Automated phone services powered by AI, like those by Simbo AI, help medical offices handle patient calls efficiently while supporting health literacy goals. These systems can triage calls, give information about services, and guide patients to decision aids or follow-up steps without burdening front desk staff.
This use of AI improves workflow and supports patients’ understanding by providing timely, accurate, and clear information. Simbo AI’s solutions show how AI can ease administrative work and improve communication—a valuable factor in informed decision-making.
Automation tools also optimize administrative tasks such as appointment scheduling, reminders, prior authorizations, and follow-up messages based on linked data findings. For example, if linked data shows a patient qualifies for a preventive program or follow-up care, automated alerts can notify staff or patients, reducing missed opportunities.
Continuous Quality Improvement methods used in decision aid programs at primary care practices demonstrate that shifting tasks to front desk or nursing staff with automated support helps maintain efforts to provide health information effectively despite limited clinical time or provider training.
The U.S. healthcare system’s experience shows that linked data efforts can lead to more integrated and evidence-based care. For medical practice administrators and owners, building capacity to engage in these data projects can improve patient management, reduce administrative work, and support better financial oversight.
States with Medicaid expansion and strong social services, such as Florida, Kentucky, Iowa, Washington, and Indiana, see measurable benefits from linked data programs. Practices serving foster children, behavioral health patients, or people with complex chronic conditions can gain much from coordinated data that identifies risk factors and supports personalized care.
Investing in AI-driven front-office automation, like Simbo AI’s phone answering tools, is a useful approach. It improves patient communication and frees staff to focus on more complex care coordination. These technologies also help meet health literacy goals by ensuring patients receive clear and consistent information in a timely manner.
Linking health and human services data is becoming more important in the U.S. healthcare system. It offers clear benefits for patient decision-making, program oversight, and operational efficiency. Medical practice leaders and IT professionals may find adopting linked data methods and related AI technologies a necessary step toward a more connected, transparent, and patient-focused care environment.
ASPE, the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, advises the Secretary of HHS on policy development, focusing on coordination, legislation, strategic planning, research, evaluation, and economic analysis.
HHS is monitoring various trends, including health and child care costs, telehealth utilization, and the prevalence of behavioral health issues among older adults.
Linking health and human services data can provide patients with better insights to make informed decisions regarding their health and care options.
The Evidence Act emphasizes the importance of evaluation policy and planning within healthcare, enhancing data-driven decision-making.
Growing healthcare costs, especially in child care and behavioral health, pose unsustainable challenges for the healthcare system.
HHS focuses on policies that support aging populations through various programs and data analyses to improve care and services.
Telehealth utilization trends are being analyzed to understand their impact on accessibility and quality of care in the healthcare system.
ASPE collaborates with multiple committees such as the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee and those focusing on behavioral health and aging.
Secured data connections enhance patient privacy and the integrity of sensitive health information shared online.
ASPE participates in initiatives like the Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (CARB) project, aiming to address and mitigate the risks posed by antibiotic resistance.