AI systems can be hard to understand. They work using algorithms and data that often seem like a “black box” — meaning their decisions are not clear to patients or sometimes even to doctors. This makes it hard for patients to trust AI and gives problems for getting informed consent. If the information is too technical, patients may get confused and not know what AI is doing in their care.
Medical practice managers, owners, and IT staff in the United States should know that healthcare AI is not just a tool; it is also part of how patients and providers work together. The White House’s Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights highlights “Notice and Explanation” as one of five important rules for using AI. It says that automated systems must explain how they work clearly and in simple words. The goal is to help patients understand when a machine is used, how it affects them, and what choices they have.
Plain language explanations do several important things:
Usually, informed consent means explaining medical procedures, their benefits, and risks to patients. Adding AI to healthcare makes this harder. Studies show many consent forms don’t clearly tell patients how AI works, what data it uses, or the possible biases.
The research paper From Black Box to Clarity: Strategies for Effective AI Informed Consent in Healthcare points out key problems:
Because AI can affect patient health a lot, these problems mean we need to redesign consent processes. Suggestions include using plain language, pictures, and interactive digital tools that give personalized information. This helps patients better understand the benefits and risks of AI and make real informed choices.
Being open about AI use is very important for building trust in healthcare. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Leadership Alliance, made up of many healthcare groups, found that most patients want to be told when AI is part of their care. But they don’t want detailed technical talks — they want to know AI use is safe and responsible.
A step-by-step approach to transparency works well:
One example from the IHI is using ambient AI scribes in clinics. These devices record doctor-patient talks to make clinical notes. When patients got clear info and said yes, acceptance was high. Also, doctors paid more attention during visits—increasing from 49% fully focused before AI to 90% after. This shows that being transparent helps not only patients but also doctors work better.
Along with transparency, training staff for different healthcare roles is vital. Training should be practical, interactive, and cover how to use AI tools, their limits, policies, and how to handle AI mistakes. Ongoing education using workshops, videos, and AI leaders on teams helps keep staff skilled as AI changes.
Formal AI rules should also include notifying patients, protecting privacy, and committees to watch AI use. These steps build responsibility and safe AI use in medical offices.
AI’s role in healthcare goes beyond medical decisions. It helps with daily operations such as front-office tasks. Companies like Simbo AI focus on automating phone calls and answering services with AI. This kind of automation can make offices run better while keeping communication patient-focused.
Practice managers and IT teams face the task of balancing automation benefits with patient privacy, clear info, and access. AI phone systems can handle scheduling, reminders, and questions, which lowers staff work and cuts patient wait times. But these systems must work within rules like the AI Bill of Rights, covering safety, fairness, privacy, and backup human help.
Points to consider for AI in front-office automation:
Using AI call automation carefully helps offices free staff for other work while keeping patient trust and satisfaction.
The White House’s Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights is an important policy guide for how AI should be used in many areas, including healthcare. Created by the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), this blueprint has five main rules to protect people’s rights and safety:
These rules are very important for medical practices using AI. They help make sure AI does not harm civil rights or fair access to healthcare. As President Biden said, privacy is the base for many other rights, so clear AI use with privacy rules is very important.
Healthcare groups using AI must make strong policies that follow these rules. Doing this not only meets the law but also builds patient trust in modern healthcare.
A big problem for using AI well in healthcare is poor communication between doctors and patients. Many doctors don’t have enough training on AI and may find it hard to explain complex AI functions. This causes misunderstandings, less trust, and less willingness to use AI care.
To fix this, healthcare groups should train staff to:
Training doctors helps AI fit better into care and stops over-trusting or ignoring AI. As shown by the IHI Leadership Alliance, when doctors understand and trust AI, they focus more on patients and improve care quality.
Research and policies show the need for clear laws that control AI use in U.S. healthcare. These laws should cover consent, being open about AI, data protection, and staff training. They guide fair and ethical AI use.
Also, AI systems and patient feedback should be checked continuously. This helps health systems find and fix problems fast, improve communication, and increase patient understanding. This flexible way makes sure AI keeps meeting changing medical and ethical needs.
Researchers like M. Chau, M.G. Rahman, and T. Debnath suggest using digital tools that give personalized info and pictures to explain AI ideas. These can work with good policies to raise patient engagement and trust.
For medical practice managers, owners, and IT teams in the United States, knowing these parts of AI healthcare is important for success. Clear, simple patient explanations combined with open policies, staff training, and careful automation in offices help make healthcare safer, fairer, and more trusted when using AI.
The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights is a framework developed by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to guide the design, use, and deployment of automated systems in ways that protect the American public’s rights, opportunities, and access to critical resources while upholding civil rights, privacy, and equity in the age of AI.
The five principles are: 1) Safe and Effective Systems, 2) Algorithmic Discrimination Protections, 3) Data Privacy, 4) Notice and Explanation, and 5) Human Alternatives, Consideration, and Fallback. These guide the development and usage of automated systems to protect individuals and communities from harm and inequities.
Plain language explanations ensure that individuals understand when AI systems are used, how decisions affecting them are made, and who is responsible. This transparency helps build trust, enables informed consent, supports accountability, and empowers patients to challenge or opt out of AI-driven healthcare decisions.
It means automated systems should be developed with input from diverse experts, undergo testing and risk mitigation, and demonstrate safety and effectiveness for their intended use. Systems must proactively prevent harm, avoid the use of irrelevant data, and allow for removal if unsafe or ineffective.
Automated systems must be designed and used equitably, avoiding unjustified disparate impacts based on protected characteristics like race, gender, or disability. This includes equity assessments, representative data use, disparity testing, mitigation strategies, and making impact assessments publicly available.
It mandates privacy-by-design principles, collecting only necessary data with meaningful user consent, avoiding deceptive defaults, and ensuring enhanced safeguards for sensitive data in health, finance, and more. Users should control their data and be informed about its use, with heightened oversight of surveillance technologies.
Automated systems must notify users of their use with clear, accessible, and regularly updated plain language documentation explaining system function, responsible entities, and decision rationale. Explanations should be meaningful, timely, and suitable to the risk level, supporting user understanding and transparency.
Users should have the option to opt out of automated decisions where appropriate and access timely human review and remediation if AI systems fail or cause errors. Human oversight must be accessible, equitable, effective, and tailored to high-risk domains like healthcare and justice.
The framework applies to automated systems that have the potential to meaningfully impact individuals’ or communities’ rights, opportunities, or access to critical resources and services, such as healthcare, housing, employment, and benefits, protecting equal treatment regardless of technological complexity.
By requiring independent evaluation, public reporting, plain language impact assessments, and transparent documentation of safety, discrimination mitigation, data privacy practices, and human oversight processes, the Blueprint fosters accountability, enabling the public to understand, trust, and challenge AI-driven decisions affecting them.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
