Healthcare providers, including medical practice administrators, owners, and IT managers across the United States, are using artificial intelligence (AI) more often to improve their work and patient care. AI tools can help make work easier, lower costs, and improve diagnoses. But when calculating how much money AI saves, it is important to think about all the costs, not just the price of the technology. Some costs inside the organization can greatly change the final result.
This article explains how internal costs affect the real return on investment (ROI) of healthcare AI projects. It also shows why organizations need to look at all costs when they consider AI solutions.
Studies by experts like Ferrum Health say that using AI widely in healthcare in the US could save 5% to 10% of total healthcare spending each year. That means $200 billion to $360 billion could be saved yearly.
While these numbers show AI’s potential, understanding real ROI is not simple. Many AI sellers calculate ROI based only on the cost to buy or license AI software. But this view leaves out other things a healthcare group must spend money on to put AI in place and keep it working.
Not counting these internal costs can make people think AI will save more money than it really does. For example, a project that looks like it will earn 20% ROI might actually lose 30% after all expenses are counted. This can hurt the healthcare provider financially.
When healthcare groups spend money on AI, many extra internal costs come up besides paying the vendor. These are the costs of the people and resources needed to check, install, and keep AI systems running.
Here are some internal costs that are often missed:
When internal costs are accounted for, the real cost of AI in healthcare becomes clear. Vendors often report ROI by only counting the price of the AI software, missing these extra internal costs. This causes a big difference between expected and real returns.
For example, an AI system might cost $500,000. If you only count the price of the software and the income is $600,000, it looks like a 20% ROI. But if internal costs are $250,000 to $350,000, the total cost is really $750,000 to $850,000. That turns the ROI negative, meaning a loss instead of a gain.
This shows how important it is for administrators, owners, and IT managers to look at all costs before deciding on AI. If they don’t, they might choose tools that hurt their budget instead of helping it.
How AI is used can also change the ROI. Experts at Ferrum Health say using many AI programs through one platform can lower costs for administration, IT, and clinicians.
Instead of buying many single-use AI tools, each needing its own setup and training, healthcare groups can put many AI tools on one system. This makes management easier, cuts repeated costs, and raises returns as new tools are added more easily.
For healthcare groups in the US, using a platform means:
Because of these savings, the real ROI can get better with each new AI tool added to one platform. This is important for practices that want to keep costs low and run well in the long run.
AI can also help by automating everyday work in healthcare. Medical offices and hospitals in the US often get many patient calls, manage appointments, handle billing questions, and do other daily tasks. These tasks need many staff hours but AI can do much of this work automatically.
Companies like Simbo AI build systems that automate phone calls and answer patient questions using AI. Their technology can:
By using AI for these tasks, medical administrators save time spent on routine duties and lower internal costs. This improves ROI by:
Automation shows how AI can cut internal costs that otherwise raise total project spending. So, when choosing AI tools, including providers like Simbo AI who focus on front-office automation is important for a full cost-benefit view.
Healthcare organizations in the US must follow rules like HIPAA and protect patient data when they use AI. The AI tools also need to work with current Electronic Health Records (EHR) and fit into clinical workflows. This avoids problems.
Costs for making sure of compliance, upgrading IT systems, cybersecurity steps, and staff training add up. These must be counted in budgets and plans.
If these are ignored, costs can rise and earnings from AI may be delayed. Healthcare leaders must include these in their cost plans.
Because of all the factors, having a strong AI plan that looks at all costs and plans the rollout well is very important. The plan should:
Having this kind of plan lowers surprise costs and matches AI spending with both clinical and operation goals.
This article focuses on admin and operational AI costs, but clinical AI tools like those from Rayscape AI have similar internal cost issues, even though they directly help patient care.
Rayscape AI works with radiology for chest X-rays and lung CT scans. It tries to make diagnoses faster and improve patient experience. While helpful, clinical AI also needs training for staff, IT integration, and following rules, which affect ROI numbers.
Medical practice administrators, healthcare owners, and IT leaders should look at all costs to find the real financial returns of AI. Knowing and managing internal costs is as important as checking vendor prices and expected revenue. This way, healthcare groups in the US can make smart choices to get the most from AI technology.
Research estimates that broader adoption of AI could lead to savings between 5% and 10% in healthcare spending, amounting to roughly $200 billion to $360 billion annually.
The main challenge is that vendors often misrepresent ROI by only considering the cost of the AI algorithm and not the comprehensive internal costs incurred by the implementing organization.
Including internal resource costs is crucial because they significantly contribute to the total investment needed to identify, evaluate, and deploy AI solutions.
Overlooked costs include administrative personnel time, clinician productivity loss, IT personnel costs, and hardware/software maintenance needed for AI deployment.
When all internal costs are included, the total cost of deployment can rise considerably, turning a positive ROI into a negative one, as demonstrated in the example.
Deploying multiple algorithms in a platform scenario decreases the cost of subsequent deployments, improving overall ROI and minimizing resource allocation.
A platform model allows for streamlined deployments, reducing administrative and personnel costs and leading to substantial returns with each additional AI algorithm.
Many organizations mistakenly believe that deploying single AI solutions will yield immediate financial benefits without considering the cumulative internal costs involved.
Healthcare organizations should develop a robust AI strategy that includes a true platform vendor to avoid financial strain and maximize ROI.
AI can enhance patient care outcomes by delivering better algorithms tailored to a healthcare facility’s specific needs and patient population, improving diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
