Generative AI means AI technologies that can create things like text, pictures, or sounds based on the data they get. Unlike older AI that just analyzes data or follows fixed rules, generative AI makes new content. This can help make work faster and bring new ideas. Research from McKinsey says generative AI might add $4.4 trillion in economic value worldwide. Healthcare is one area that could benefit a lot.
In healthcare, especially in medical offices, generative AI can help with scheduling, answering patient questions, managing records, and reading clinical notes. These uses might help workers do more and cut costs. But the technology also has risks. It could cause problems with data security, patient privacy, or the quality of care if AI results are wrong or unfair.
A recent survey found that 63% of organizations earning over $50 million think using generative AI is very important. But 91% of them say they are not ready to use it responsibly. This shows many healthcare providers need stronger AI management before they start using it.
Using generative AI in healthcare brings good chances and worries. The main risks are:
Medical practice administrators in the U.S. must address these risks because health information is very sensitive. Strict laws like HIPAA protect patient data. Not managing AI risks well can hurt the organization’s reputation, cause legal problems, and harm patients.
To deal with these challenges, healthcare groups need clear roles in their AI risk management plans. Here are key roles based on McKinsey’s analysis and expert views:
The people who create generative AI apps must build safety into the design. They should create algorithms that reduce bias, keep accuracy, and protect privacy. Developers need to test their AI carefully before using it. Brittany Presten from McKinsey says it’s important to build responsibility into AI from the start.
Healthcare groups should form AI governance teams. These teams should have business leaders, tech experts, lawyers, compliance officers, and data privacy staff. They should meet regularly, like every month, to review AI uses, check risks, and decide on safe AI practice. This helps make sure AI follows ethics and laws.
Lareina Yee from McKinsey points out that these teams help make balanced and informed decisions. It’s also important that governance doesn’t slow down work too much.
Staff who use AI tools daily, like front-office workers or IT managers, must know how to use AI in a safe way. They need to spot when AI answers may be wrong and know how to check or report issues. Basic training on AI risks and safe use should be given to everyone who handles AI.
The top leaders must make AI risk management a priority and provide resources for it. They guide the group to adopt AI responsibly by balancing fast innovation with safety checks. Michael Chui from McKinsey warns that not managing AI risks well can cause executives, staff, and patients to lose trust, which hurts the organization’s goals.
These teams watch over laws and rules about AI. The U.S. government, including the Biden administration, highlights the need for ethical and accountable AI use, especially in healthcare. Compliance teams make sure AI follows HIPAA and patient consent laws, and they watch for intellectual property issues.
According to McKinsey, medical administrators can follow these steps to improve AI risk governance:
Organizations should review these risks at least every six months. They need to update policies as AI technology and threats change. Oliver Bevan from McKinsey says adapting proven risk methods specifically for generative AI is key to using it responsibly.
One helpful use of generative AI in healthcare is automating front-office phone services. Companies like Simbo AI focus on AI phone automation and answering help. This helps medical practices manage patient calls better and reduce the workload on staff.
Medical front-office workers often spend a lot of time answering routine calls—things like booking appointments, handling prescription requests, or giving basic patient info. These tasks take up time and can make wait times longer for patients.
Using AI answering services lets offices:
Like all AI uses, phone automation must manage risks. Healthcare leaders need to make sure automated responses are correct, private, and protect patient information. AI should not share sensitive health data without proper checks.
The governance groups mentioned before should also oversee AI phone systems. This includes regularly checking response quality and security. Training front-office staff to use AI tools well helps fix patient questions or errors after calls.
IT teams are key to:
These actions help healthcare groups use AI automation well and keep risks low.
Healthcare leaders in the U.S. face a challenge. AI technology moves fast and there is pressure to adopt it quickly to stay competitive and improve operations. But rushing can put patients and organizations at risk.
Government bodies like the Biden administration stress ethical governance and accountability in AI. Healthcare groups must build a culture where responsible AI use is part of everyday work. Training, governance, and ongoing checks are important to find the right balance.
| Role | Responsibilities |
|---|---|
| Designers & Developers | Build responsibility into AI design; test carefully before use |
| Governors (AI Steering Group) | Oversee AI use; check risks; ensure ethics and legal rules; meet regularly |
| Users & Operators | Use AI carefully; spot errors; take part in training |
| Executives | Lead strategy; provide resources; balance innovation and risk management |
| Legal & Compliance | Make sure AI follows laws; watch privacy and intellectual property risks |
| IT Managers | Set up AI safely; monitor performance; keep cybersecurity strong |
Medical practices in the United States have both the chance and duty to use generative AI carefully. By defining roles, building governance teams, and including AI properly in workflows like phone automation, they can get benefits while cutting risks. The success of AI in healthcare depends on both technology and people’s commitment to safety and responsibility.
Generative AI has the potential to add up to $4.4 trillion in economic value to the global economy, enhancing the impact of all AI by 15 to 40 percent.
The risks include inaccurate outputs, embedded biases, misinformation, malicious influence, and potential reputational damage.
91 percent of organizations surveyed felt they were not ‘very prepared’ to implement generative AI in a responsible manner.
Inbound threats include increased sophistication of fraud, security breaches, and external risks from malicious use of AI.
Organizations should understand inbound exposures, assess materiality of risks, establish a governance structure, and embed it in their operational model.
Organizations should consider security threats, third-party risks, malicious use, and intellectual property infringement among other risks.
They can assess risks by categorizing them according to severity, identifying bias, privacy concerns, and inaccuracies specific to each use case.
Organizations should form cross-functional steering groups, refresh existing policies, and foster a culture of responsible AI across all levels.
Key roles include designers, engineers, governors, and users, each responsible for distinct aspects of the risk management process.
Organizations should repeat the risk assessment at least semiannually until the pace of change stabilizes and their defenses mature.