The 340B Drug Pricing Program helps certain healthcare groups buy outpatient medicines at low prices. These groups are called covered entities (CEs). The goal is to make sure people without enough insurance or money can get the medicines they need. This includes people living in small towns or poor city areas.
Medicines bought through the 340B Program must be given only to eligible patients. There are strict rules for this. Breaking these rules can cause legal and money problems.
A material breach means a serious rule-breaking that hurts a covered entity’s use of the 340B Program. The federal agency in charge, called HRSA, does not give one fixed meaning for this. But many groups agree on some key points.
For example, the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) says a material breach happens when problems with duplicate discounts and diversion go over 5% of total 340B drugs given out. Many groups use this 5% number to decide when a problem is big enough to report right away.
Each covered entity can also set its own limits based on audits, prescription numbers, or money effects. This helps them handle risks better.
If a covered entity finds a material breach, it must report it quickly. HRSA says they should tell the drug makers, HRSA itself, and state health departments if needed. Reports should include:
This report should happen soon after finding the issue. Usually, a top official or compliance officer makes this report.
Reporting quickly shows honesty and helps avoid more fines. It also helps when working with drug makers to solve the problem.
After reporting a material breach, a covered entity must create a Corrective Action Plan (CAP). The CAP is a detailed plan to fix and prevent problems. It needs input from several groups, like legal staff, finance, pharmacy leaders, compliance officers, and auditors.
A CAP should:
Usually, covered entities must finish the CAP within six months. Some states, like Texas, check the reports and the CAP to make sure they work well.
Breaches in 340B rules often happen because of system or operation problems. Apexus, a 340B program partner, says one cause is data errors that hurt the accuracy of records. Other causes are:
Healthcare groups should check their systems regularly to catch problems early. Staff or consultants watching closely and clear rules help lower risks.
HRSA requires covered entities to have a 340B oversight committee. This group helps keep the program rules in place. It should include people like the CEO, CFO, chief pharmacy officer, compliance officers, audit directors, finance and pharmacy staff, and IT people.
The committee’s jobs are:
Good leadership and regular meetings help the committee work well. Smaller groups may combine this duty with other committees like finance or quality assurance.
When a covered entity finds that it bought 340B drugs in an invalid way or pharmacies do not follow rules, money may need to be paid back. This usually happens through a credit or rebill process handled by wholesalers.
This must have approval from drug makers and follow strict time limits. Problems in repayment can happen because:
Services like Apexus’s Covered Entity Refund Service help covered entities fix repayment issues. They provide project management, drug maker contacts, and price data.
Good inventory management helps prevent material breaches. “Neutral inventory” means keeping drug stock balanced to match patient needs without extra stock piling up. Too much stock, or accumulations, can cause record problems and rule breaks like duplicate discounts.
Training by groups like Apexus teaches pharmacy and compliance staff how to manage this. Topics include:
Keeping neutral inventory lowers the chance of buying too many drugs and helps audits go smoothly.
Technology is becoming more helpful for covered entities managing 340B rules. Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation tools assist with many tasks:
Using AI and automation helps make compliance more accurate, lowers staff work, and speeds up fixing problems.
For medical practice leaders and managers in the United States, knowing what a material breach means in the 340B Program is important. Covered entities must stop drug diversion and duplicate discounts, watch compliance all the time, and report material breaches quickly.
Making a corrective action plan, keeping clear rules, and having a strong oversight committee all help keep compliance steady.
Using AI and automation tools can also make managing the 340B Program easier. These tools help find problems, report them, and handle admin tasks. This support lets covered entities focus on giving affordable healthcare to people who need it.
The 340B Drug Pricing Program allows eligible healthcare organizations to purchase outpatient drugs at reduced prices, aiming to expand access to medications for vulnerable populations.
Common non-compliance areas include diversion of drugs, duplicate discounts, and failing to maintain auditable records as required by the program.
A Material Breach refers to significant violations of 340B Program requirements; the covered entity must define and assess it in conjunction with their oversight committee.
Covered entities must notify impacted manufacturers, attempt to resolve issues directly, and self-report to HRSA if there is a Material Breach.
HRSA expects covered entities to resolve non-compliance issues, whether they constitute Material Breaches or not, and to ensure adherence to program requirements.
Covered entities should transparently notify affected manufacturers and wholesalers when requesting credit/rebill for ineligible 340B purchases, maintaining clear documentation.
HRSA emphasizes the importance of maintaining updated policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the 340B Program and best practices.
Yes, involving legal counsel in 340B agreements is advisable to ensure that all terms, especially those related to non-compliance resolution, are understood and agreed upon.
A CPS 340B Consultant can provide guidance on compliance, assist in resolving non-compliance issues, and help update policies and procedures.
Risks include non-compliance due to misplaced responsibilities and the potential lack of transparency in repayment practices by contract pharmacies or third-party administrators.