Patient-reported outcome measures, or PROMs, are detailed questionnaires that patients fill out. They tell doctors how the patient feels and functions related to their health and treatments. Doctors use this info to make better plans for care and improve treatment.
PROMs are often used for conditions like multiple sclerosis because symptoms change over time and need to be watched closely. But it can be hard to collect this data since filling out these forms can be long and boring for patients.
Satisficing Theory was first suggested by economist Herbert Simon. It explains that people often pick answers that are good enough instead of perfect. When patients do PROM questionnaires, satisficing means they might answer quickly or choose easy answers just to finish fast.
This can cause inaccurate or incomplete data, which makes it harder for doctors to make good decisions. Patients might get tired of difficult questions or lose interest if the survey takes too long.
Understanding satisficing helps healthcare leaders see why patients might not fully engage. It shows why it is important to design systems that keep patients motivated and encourage honest answers.
Embodied conversational agents, or ECAs, are AI tools that talk to patients using digital characters or voices. For PROMs, ECAs help guide patients through answering questions in a way that feels more like talking with a person instead of filling a form.
Researchers at Technische Universität Dresden made an ECA for multiple sclerosis patients. Their 2022 study showed these agents help patients better than regular questionnaires, making it less tiring to answer.
Benefits of using ECAs for PROMs include:
ECAs fit well with Satisficing Theory because they try to get patients to give good answers, not just quick ones.
The U.S. healthcare system needs reliable data for better decisions. Clinics that focus on diseases like neurology, cancer, or rheumatology can gain a lot by adding ECAs to their data collection process.
Using ECAs in U.S. clinics would:
Use of AI and automation is growing in the front offices of clinics. Companies like Simbo AI make phone systems that use AI to manage calls and messages efficiently.
How ECAs work with AI front-office systems:
Clinic managers in the U.S. must pick technology that follows laws and improves care without making work harder. Using AI automation plus ECAs gives a good balance of easy use and helpful features.
Simbo AI’s phone automation is important because many U.S. patients prefer phone calls to internet portals. This is true for older people and those living in rural areas with slow internet. Using ECAs on the phone with electronic systems lets clinics:
Researchers at Technische Universität Dresden studied ECAs with conversational interfaces. They found these work better for patient engagement than regular questionnaires. The study focused on multiple sclerosis patients but can apply to other chronic illnesses too.
Early results show patients like talking with ECAs because it feels easier and more helpful. This suggests using ECAs with AI tools can fix common issues like patient tiredness and quick, careless answers.
The researchers want to do more studies to confirm these results and help bring ECAs into more hospitals and clinics across the U.S.
Adding ECAs and AI phone systems needs careful planning. Clinic owners and managers must balance budgets, train staff, and think about patient needs.
Important factors include:
Following these points helps clinics use technology safely while keeping patients’ trust.
Satisficing Theory combined with technology like embodied conversational agents offers new ways to make patient engagement and data quality better when collecting PROMs. For U.S. clinics treating chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, ECAs could solve problems with patient participation.
Pairing AI phone automation from companies like Simbo AI with conversational agents can make clinic workflows smoother and improve communication with patients. This leads to better, more complete patient data. That helps doctors make better decisions and improve care.
Research supports these ideas and encourages healthcare leaders to think about using these technologies in their clinics.
PROMs are standardized questionnaires used to capture patients’ perspectives on their health status and treatment outcomes, playing a crucial role in guiding therapy decisions and improving quality of care.
ECAs are interactive tools designed to facilitate the completion of PROM questionnaires, making the process more engaging and potentially reducing the burden on patients.
Satisficing Theory suggests that individuals may opt for a satisfactory rather than optimal solution in completing tasks; ECAs aim to enhance engagement and motivation, thereby improving response quality and completion rates.
The research focused on multiple sclerosis patients, exploring how ECAs can assist in the collection of PROMs for this particular chronic disease.
The use of ECAs may lead to improved patient engagement, higher completion rates for questionnaires, and more accurate assessments of patient-reported outcomes.
Preliminary findings indicated that the ECA design met patients’ needs and showed promise in enhancing the collection of PROMs.
A comparative study could provide more robust evidence regarding the effectiveness and advantages of using ECAs for the collection of PROMs in clinical practice.
The literature review led to the development of an evaluation approach that includes a research model aimed at assessing the effectiveness of ECAs in collecting PROMs.
The paper discusses the need for further investigation into the efficacy and utility of ECAs in various patient populations and healthcare contexts to validate initial findings.
By facilitating patient engagement and carrying out more accurate assessments of health outcomes, ECAs can contribute to more informed therapy decisions and better overall healthcare quality.