Prior authorization means healthcare providers must get approval from insurance companies before some services or prescriptions can be paid for. Providers have to send detailed documents that explain why the service is needed. Because each insurance company has different rules, providers have to handle lots of paperwork and follow many steps. This includes filling out forms, making phone calls, sending faxes, waiting for answers, and dealing with appeals when claims are denied.
Surveys from the American Medical Association (AMA) show doctors and their teams spend about 12 to 14 hours each week managing prior authorizations. Each doctor completes around 43 to 45 requests weekly. More than one-third of doctors hire staff just to manage these tasks. This work takes time away from caring for patients and causes doctors to feel stressed and tired. In fact, 95% of doctors say prior authorization makes their burnout worse, which affects their ability to keep working.
This heavy workload is not just a problem for individual doctors but also costs healthcare systems a lot of money. For example, primary care doctors spend between $2,161 and $3,430 every year on staff time and other costs to handle prior authorizations. Hospitals and health systems spend much more—$26 billion in 2023—to manage insurance claims and prior authorizations, which is 23% more than the year before.
Following prior authorization rules is also hard because insurance companies often change their rules. Healthcare administrators must have teams that keep up with these changes, which adds to costs. This effort takes time away from patient care and can hurt the finances of healthcare organizations.
One of the biggest worries is how prior authorizations affect patients’ health. Studies from the AMA and the American College of Physicians (ACP) show that delays caused by prior authorizations can lead to serious problems, like hospital stays and even deaths. Almost a quarter of doctors (24%) have seen bad events happen because of these delays.
Because of delays, many patients stop treatments their doctors recommend. About 80% of doctors say their patients walk away from treatments because of the problems with prior authorization. More than 90% of doctors say prior authorizations harm patient care and slow down access to needed services.
These delays also cause patients to use more health resources in other ways. Nearly 90% of doctors say prior authorizations make patients need extra office visits, urgent care, emergency room trips, or hospital stays. Between 35% and 40% of prior authorization requests get denied often or always, which makes it harder to give care on time.
Patients also face big money problems. Nearly 79% of doctors say that when prior authorization is denied or delayed, patients often have to pay for medicines or services themselves. These extra costs can hurt people with less money and make it harder for them to get care.
Delays from prior authorizations also affect patients’ jobs. More than half (53%) of doctors say these delays have made it hard for their patients to keep working because their treatments were interrupted.
Doctors and hospitals face growing money problems from prior authorization. When approvals are late or denied, providers must send claims again or appeal many times. Each step costs more staff time and money. Many claim denials—about 70%—are later paid after expensive reviews, showing the system is not efficient.
These delays also hurt the cash flow for medical offices and hospitals. They must hire more staff to handle billing and claims, which adds costs. Medicare and Medicaid payments cover only 83 cents for every dollar hospitals spend on patient care, which creates financial stress. This means hospitals must be more efficient, but prior authorization increases the work needed.
More than half of hospital costs come from paying staff. Hiring more administrative workers to manage prior authorizations raises labor costs. Other problems like supply chain issues and tariffs also add to hospital costs. Still, inefficient paperwork is a reason these costs keep going up and could be stopped.
Because of these problems, some states made laws to make prior authorization easier. For example, “Gold Card” programs let doctors with high approval rates skip some prior authorization steps. This helps lower the amount of extra work.
The healthcare field is using more technology, especially artificial intelligence (AI) and workflow automation, to help with prior authorization problems. Manual processes take a lot of time and are prone to mistakes. Using technology can speed up work, reduce paperwork, and make things more accurate.
AI can automate gathering and sending data by connecting electronic health records (EHR) to insurance systems. This cuts down on human error, speeds up review, and helps providers make decisions faster. For example, AI can predict which claims might be denied and suggest better paperwork before sending requests. This lowers the chance of denials and costly appeals.
Smart computer models learn insurance company rules and manage requests without always needing manual updates. This makes the process smoother and reduces repeated phone calls or follow-ups.
More providers are starting to use electronic prior authorization, but it is still used in less than 35% of places. ePA works inside EHR systems so doctors can send requests with a few clicks. It gathers clinical data automatically and sends it securely to insurers. This cuts down the wait time from days to hours or even minutes, compared to faxing or phone calls.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) support digital standards like FHIR® and projects such as the Da Vinci Project. These help EHRs and insurance systems talk to each other easily. Providers can see prior authorization status and reasons for denials right in their workflow, which lowers paperwork and speeds up decisions.
Healthcare groups that use technology providers for prior authorization automation get ongoing help and updates. This helps keep up with changing insurance rules and makes manual work less of a problem.
Federal programs support modernizing prior authorization by requiring insurance companies to use electronic systems based on FHIR starting in 2023. These systems allow electronic requests, status checks, and clear reports on decisions.
CMS has proposed rules that force insurers to give exact reasons for denying requests and reply quickly: within 72 hours for urgent cases and 7 days for regular cases. Public reports on approval rates, denial reasons, and appeals results are meant to make the system more open and accountable.
Many states have also passed laws to improve prior authorization. These laws set standards for how fast insurers must reply, what information they must share, and rules for approvals. The Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2024 pushes for simpler prior authorizations in Medicare Advantage plans to prevent delays for older patients.
Even with federal and state actions, many insurers are slow to make these changes or drop old manual steps. So, healthcare providers have to stay alert and find technology solutions that fit updated rules.
Medical practice administrators and owners in the U.S. need to understand how prior authorizations affect daily operations, staff stress, and finances. Using AI-based workflow automation and electronic prior authorization tools can make work easier for staff and help speed up claim approvals.
IT managers have an important job connecting these new tools with current EHR systems. They must also make sure they follow privacy laws like HIPAA and support data sharing standards. Choosing technology vendors that work well with insurers and offer ongoing help is important because rules change fast.
Administrators should also keep training staff on prior authorization rules and how to appeal denials. Watching key numbers like how long approvals take and how many claims get denied can help find problems and improve processes.
Prior authorizations still cause big challenges in the U.S. healthcare system. They raise costs, delay care, and make patients unhappy. However, new AI technologies, process automation, and law changes offer practical ways to reduce these problems. Healthcare organizations that use these tools can work more efficiently and provide care faster to patients.
Common reasons for claim denials include failure to obtain prior authorization, medical necessity disputes, coding errors, and complex payer regulations. These issues delay payments and create administrative burdens for providers.
Failure to obtain prior authorization can lead to payment refusals, leaving providers uncompensated for services rendered. This is a significant issue affecting financial stability.
Technology, particularly AI and automation, can increase claim denials by applying predefined criteria selectively. This can lead to unregulated and automated denials without adequate medical review.
The process of obtaining prior authorizations is time-consuming, requiring substantial paperwork and communication with payers, contributing to high administrative costs of approximately $35 billion annually in the U.S.
Navigating payer requirements necessitates investment in billing and claims management teams. Frequent claim denials result in costly appeals and resubmissions that strain providers’ financial resources.
Investing in robust claims management systems, enhancing staff training, utilizing predictive analytics, and adopting automated workflows can significantly reduce claim denials and improve financial stability.
Healthcare organizations can optimize revenue cycle management by reducing claim denials, minimizing administrative waste, and employing advanced billing solutions to enhance efficiency in claim processing.
Coding errors can lead to claim rejections or underpayments, requiring additional time and resources for correction. They account for a significant percentage of overall claim denials.
Frequent changes in payer regulations require providers to adjust workflows and retrain staff promptly. Failing to comply can result in denials and financial losses.
Patient financial engagement solutions help mitigate the economic impact of claim denials by offering flexible payment plans and financial assistance, ensuring patients access necessary care despite coverage issues.