Third-party vendors are a big part of healthcare IT and daily work. They help with electronic health records (EHRs), billing, cloud storage, diagnostic tools, and telemedicine services. These partnerships help healthcare run smoothly, but they also create more chances for cyberattacks.
Recent studies show that about 44% of healthcare organizations in the U.S. had data breaches or cyberattacks through third-party network access in the past year. Almost half (47%) of healthcare providers stopped working with some vendors after security problems. These breaches do more than just lose data; they can also delay patient care and cause legal and money troubles. Around 60% of healthcare groups lost or had private information stolen because of third-party breaches. Nearly half (49%) were fined by regulators after these events.
Third-party vendors often have special access to sensitive systems that hold protected health information (PHI). Cybercriminals know this and often attack these vendors. Many vendors have weaker security and fewer resources to fight attacks. This makes vendor systems a weak link in healthcare security.
One main reason cybercriminals go after third-party vendors is their uneven and often weak security measures. Many vendors do not have strong cybersecurity rules or do not fully follow healthcare laws like HIPAA. Even if healthcare providers protect their own systems well, weak vendor security can cause problems.
Also, medical devices and software from third parties sometimes use old technology. These old systems cannot support the newest security updates or encryption. They often lack basic protections and are open to intrusion. As healthcare IT systems connect more, a weak point in one vendor’s system can let attackers move across many systems and cause more damage.
Healthcare leaders must update these systems safely without hurting patient care or causing problems. Checking and approving vendors for security takes time and money but is important given the risks.
Third-party breaches hurt healthcare work in many ways. When systems are attacked, patient care might be delayed because records are not available or workflows stop. Research shows ransomware attacks have gone up 264% in five years. Healthcare providers are often targets because their services are critical. Interruptions can cause delayed treatments, longer hospital stays, and even more deaths.
Money problems also happen. Healthcare groups can face large fines for breaking HIPAA rules due to bad third-party risk handling. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) can fine starting at $50,000 per violation for mistakes done on purpose. Besides fines, hospitals pay for fixing incidents, repairing systems, losing reputation, and spending more on cybersecurity.
Many healthcare groups know there are risks with third parties but still find it hard to manage them well. Only 36% of health IT workers say their group has a steady approach to handle risks with privileged access. Although many have tools to manage vendor access, just having tools is not enough without clear rules and responsibilities.
Healthcare teams often feel overwhelmed managing who has permissions and remote access. About 45% say it uses up a lot of their resources. Usually, it’s not clear who controls access because IT, legal, and HR departments all share duties without clear accountability. This confusion causes delays and mistakes, making security weaker.
Limited budgets and resources also make it harder to watch vendor security all the time. Plus, many practices use old IT hardware and software, which makes it tough to add new security controls or detect threats well.
Healthcare organizations in the U.S. need many-layered strategies to manage third-party risks. Some useful steps include:
Healthcare leaders must set aside enough budget for these activities. Hiring staff skilled in vendor security helps protect patient data and cuts costs and disruptions in the long run.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation tools can help manage third-party risks better in healthcare. They can do routine jobs like managing access, watching vendor security, and creating incident reports. This reduces work for busy staff.
AI tools can check lots of network activity quickly and spot strange events that might mean a breach from vendors. They can warn about suspicious logins, unusual data moves, or use outside allowed times, so staff can act fast.
Automation helps with checking vendor credentials and security compliance. For example, alerts can remind admins when vendor access needs review or contracts need updated security checks.
AI also helps spot and prevent phishing by simulating attacks on staff and vendors. As attackers use new tricks, including AI to mimic voices or emails, this training is helpful.
Healthcare groups can use AI to keep up with new risks and change how they manage vendors. This keeps security strong even with new types of attacks.
By using AI and automation, healthcare admins can reduce mistakes, speed up security tasks, and stay in line with laws.
Good third-party risk management needs both technology and teamwork. Healthcare leaders must work closely with doctors, IT, and vendors to share responsibility for security.
Studies show doctors often find security rules interrupt their work. When security slows patient care, doctors might resist following rules. Including them in decisions and making security tools that help instead of hurt their work improves acceptance and effectiveness.
Leadership is key for setting goals, funding, and showing good security habits. Praising security work encourages all staff to stay alert. Regular security training, like learning to spot phishing and securing devices, helps everyone using healthcare IT systems.
Medical practices in the U.S. face special cybersecurity challenges. They must follow HIPAA and other laws that require strong privacy and security, especially when using third-party vendors.
Practices handle a lot of sensitive patient data, making them targets for cybercriminals. They must make sure every vendor working with patient data meets rules and uses strong security.
Practices differ in size and resources. Small ones may not have cybersecurity teams, so they must rely more on good automation and vendor tools. Larger ones may need advanced solutions to manage many vendors and complex systems.
Practices also need to watch out for ransomware and social engineering attacks. Attackers use AI to create fake emails or voices to trick people. Practices should update training often to fight these threats.
Knowing the problems with third-party vendors and using practical, tech-based security steps can help U.S. medical practices lower risks. This protects patient data, care delivery, and the finances of the organization.
Third-party vendors are important for modern healthcare but can bring big cybersecurity risks if not managed carefully. U.S. healthcare providers need clear strategies, strong leadership, and investments in technology like AI and automation to protect against cybercriminals targeting their suppliers. Working together, checking often, and acting early help medical practice admins, owners, and IT managers keep systems safe and trust strong for patient care.
Third-party risk management is crucial in healthcare as nearly half of organizations face data breaches due to third-party network access, leading to operational and financial disruptions.
In a recent survey, 44% of healthcare organizations reported experiencing a third-party data breach or cyberattack within the last year.
Only 36% of health IT respondents reported that their organizations have a consistently applied strategy to address privileged access risks.
Consequences include loss or theft of confidential information, severed relationships with third parties, regulatory fines, and business disruptions.
Over 40% of respondents anticipate an increase in data breaches caused by third parties in the next 12 to 24 months.
Top barriers include lack of governance, budget constraints, insufficient visibility, and low confidence in solution efficacy.
All healthcare respondents reported having a VPAM or privileged access management solution, but employing such tools alone is insufficient for effective risk management.
Organizations struggle with defining roles and responsibilities, leading to inconsistent management of third-party access rights across IT, legal, and HR teams.
Third-party vendors often have privileged access to sensitive systems, making them attractive targets for cybercriminals seeking to exploit these access rights.
Organizations are recognizing threats and initiating steps to ensure proper access control for high-value assets, but they must apply these strategies consistently.