Healthcare finance leaders face two main pressures. They must improve financial performance by increasing collections, cutting denied claims, and managing cash flow better. At the same time, they need to make operations more efficient by simplifying workflows, reducing manual work, and using staff time more wisely.
Labor costs are rising, making it costly to keep large billing, coding, and claims teams. Shrinking profit margins leave little room for mistakes or delays. This means healthcare providers must find new ways to do more with less. Digital revenue cycle management tools offer help, but many organizations have yet to fully adopt them.
A survey by Waystar and The Health Management Academy collected data from 150 large U.S. health systems. It shows how they use digital tools now. Between 6% and 28% of these systems use AI and RPA in different parts of the revenue cycle, like front-end, mid-cycle, and back-end tasks.
Most who use AI and RPA say they do it to improve financial results. These tools help with claims submission, payment posting, auditing, and managing denied claims. Health systems that use AI and RPA feel better about their revenue cycle processes than those who do not use these tools or only plan to.
Still, only about half of the leading health systems plan to invest in AI and RPA for revenue cycle tools in the next three years. This shows a gap—leaders see the benefits but are cautious or face problems in putting these tools into practice.
What stops faster adoption? The barriers are both based on what people think and on real problems.
Many healthcare groups doubt if AI and RPA will give a good return for the money spent. They worry about using scarce resources on technology when the results are hard to measure at first. Some finance leaders fear automation might not be accurate or able to handle complex revenue cycle tasks.
Digital RCM tools often must fit into existing hospital systems like electronic health records (EHRs) and billing software. This can be tricky and expensive. IT teams may have trouble with compatibility, making them hesitant to add new systems that might disrupt current work.
Using AI and automation means changing workflows and training staff. Employees used to manual work may fear their jobs are at risk or may not know how to use the new tools. Practice managers and IT staff must spend time and resources on coaching, which can slow down or reduce the will to adopt new tools.
Healthcare groups follow strict rules about patient data safety. Adding new digital tools makes it harder to meet rules like HIPAA. Finance leaders hesitate if they think technology providers cannot fully protect data.
Buying and setting up AI and RPA solutions costs a lot at first. With tight budgets and other priorities, hospitals may find it hard to justify the cost, especially when financial benefits might take time to appear.
About half of the top health systems plan to invest in AI and RPA for revenue cycle management in the next three years. This shows that interest is growing despite the barriers.
This interest is often because of pressure to lower labor costs and improve collections. Labor costs are rising faster than inflation, and payments from insurers are not keeping up. Automation can help reduce mistakes, speed up claim processing, and increase collections.
The front office handles tasks like scheduling, patient registration, insurance checks, and pre-authorization. These steps are important because errors here often cause claim denials and payment delays. AI automation can:
Healthcare providers using front-office automation see better patient experiences and fewer billing errors.
The mid and back parts of the revenue cycle deal with claim submission, payment posting, denial management, and following up on accounts receivable. These are repetitive tasks that involve lots of data.
Robotic process automation can:
AI and RPA together cut down manual work, speed payments, and improve accuracy. Used well, these tools help healthcare groups keep better cash flow and reduce how long it takes to collect payments.
The 150 largest health systems show the real benefits AI and RPA bring to revenue cycle management. They report better financial performance and smoother operations than those who rely on manual or partly automated processes.
This success comes not only from improved cash flow but also less work for staff. For example, phone automation helps handle calls without needing extra staff. It also improves patient communication by answering common billing questions right away.
To beat the doubts and problems in adopting AI and RPA, clear plans and strong leadership are needed.
Healthcare organizations in the U.S. face challenges in controlling costs and financial results. Digital revenue cycle management tools using AI and RPA offer a way to meet these challenges. While some barriers remain, more health systems plan to use automation in revenue management.
The next steps involve knowing the limits and benefits of these tools. Adoption should move carefully with good leadership from practice administrators and IT teams in hospitals and clinics.
Healthcare finance leaders face the challenge of improving financial performance and operational efficiency amid rising labor costs and shrinking margins.
Technology solutions powered by artificial intelligence can help close the gap between expected outcomes and achievable results in revenue cycle management.
There is a disconnect between the perceived value of digital revenue cycle management tools powered by AI and RPA, which acts as a barrier to their adoption.
About half of leading health systems plan to invest in AI and RPA for revenue cycle management within the next three years to improve financial performance.
The survey reveals insights from 150 of the largest health systems, focusing on barriers and opportunities in adopting digital tools for revenue cycle management.
Among surveyed health systems, 6% to 28% report using AI and RPA for various revenue cycle management stages.
82% of hospitals using AI and RPA adopted the tools to improve financial performance.
Health systems currently using AI and RPA report higher satisfaction with their revenue cycle management processes than those not using these tools.
The E-book comprises seven reports on the adoption and benefits of AI and RPA, offering insights essential for healthcare teams.
Implementing RPA in revenue cycles can lead to enhanced productivity, increased collections, and a more efficient operational framework for healthcare providers.