Healthcare supply chains in the U.S. involve moving drugs, medical devices, equipment, and other important items from makers to providers and then to patients. This process is tough because of several reasons:
Because of these problems, blockchain technology, which is a type of digital ledger that is decentralized, has gained attention as a way to improve transparency, security, and trust in healthcare supply chains.
Blockchain technology can help healthcare supply chains in these ways:
These features make blockchain a useful tool to fight fake medicines, protect medical devices, support Internet of Healthy Things (IoHT) functions, and improve supply chain management.
Even though blockchain can help, most projects in U.S. healthcare supply chains are still small tests or pilots. Research by Kevin A. Clauson, Elizabeth A. Breeden, Cameron Davidson, and Timothy K. Mackey showed some reasons for this:
Because of these challenges, healthcare managers and IT staff find it hard to adopt blockchain widely yet.
The healthcare industry in the U.S. is controlled by agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Blockchain tools must follow laws like HIPAA, the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA), and others that protect patient privacy, drug tracking, and quality.
However, current rules do not officially recognize blockchain data as legal proof. There are gaps about how blockchain data should be stored, accessed, and managed. This makes decision-makers unsure and less willing to use blockchain fully until clearer rules exist.
Blockchain needs strong technical systems. Many healthcare providers still use old systems not made for blockchain. Connecting blockchain with Electronic Health Records (EHR), inventory software, and supply chain tools is difficult and could disrupt current workflows.
Also, blockchain systems need constant maintenance, security checks, and management. Healthcare groups might not have the IT staff to handle these demands well.
While blockchain might save money by stopping fraud and errors over time, starting the system costs a lot. These costs include software development, connecting systems, training workers, and ongoing operations. Small medical practices may find it hard to pay these costs, especially when large savings are not yet proven.
Even though blockchain offers strong security, healthcare information includes private patient data protected by laws such as HIPAA. It is tricky to balance being open and keeping data private. Blockchain systems must protect private data while still letting supply chains be traced and verified.
Many healthcare managers and providers do not know much about blockchain technology. Some are doubtful about its benefits and worry it may upset current ways of working. Without simple solutions and education, blockchain use might face pushback from people involved.
To move blockchain projects beyond pilot stages in U.S. healthcare, policymakers, healthcare providers, tech developers, and industry groups need to work together.
Rules for blockchain must fit existing healthcare laws. Federal agencies should clarify how blockchain records follow HIPAA and DSCSA rules. This includes guidance on sharing data, keeping records, and audits for blockchain data.
Groups like IEEE and Health Level Seven International (HL7) can create common blockchain data standards. This would make it easier to connect with current healthcare IT systems and keep data consistent.
More pilot projects with thorough study and sharing best practices can show how well blockchain works. Long-term studies on cost savings, security, and patient care effects will give proof for wider use.
Policy makers could offer help like grants, tax breaks, or tech support to encourage healthcare providers to use blockchain. This would lower money barriers and help develop new ideas.
Working together among healthcare providers, tech companies, regulators, and patient groups can bring balanced views and build trust in blockchain tools.
Timothy K. Mackey, an Associate Professor at UC San Diego School of Medicine and co-chair of the IEEE Standards Association program on pharmaceutical supply chains, points out the need for matching policy and technology to reach blockchain’s full capability.
Blockchain is helpful for secure and clear healthcare supply chains but is only part of the solution. Artificial intelligence (AI) and workflow automation also help improve healthcare operations.
Healthcare managers who know about blockchain and AI can combine these tools to build stronger and more efficient supply chains.
Medical practice managers and IT staff in the U.S. should understand these technology trends and challenges. Blockchain could change supply chain management and improve patient safety by making sure medicines and devices are real. But using blockchain needs careful navigation of rules, technical issues, and costs.
Administrators should:
By doing these things, healthcare administrators and IT workers can prepare their groups carefully to use future technologies that may make healthcare supply chains safer, clearer, and more effective.
The primary challenges include complexity, risk, and the direct impact on patient safety and health outcomes when the supply chain is compromised.
Blockchain can enhance security, integrity, data provenance, and functionality, making it a potential solution to protect health supply chains.
Key sectors include pharmaceutical supply, medical devices and supplies, the Internet of Healthy Things (IoHT), and public health.
Use cases include combating counterfeit medicines, securing medical devices, optimizing IoHT functionality, and improving public health supply chains.
Most initiatives remain in pilot phases due to the need for further study, evaluation, and alignment with existing policy mechanisms.
Blockchain holds unrealized promise for improving healthcare supply chains but requires additional research and policy integration.
The study reviewed academic literature, grey literature, and industry publications related to blockchain in healthcare supply chains.
Key authors include Kevin A. Clauson, Elizabeth A. Breeden, Cameron Davidson, and Timothy K. Mackey, who are associated with various universities and healthcare roles.
Protecting the integrity is crucial because a compromised supply chain can endanger patient safety and significantly affect health outcomes.
The DOI for the article is https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v1.20.