Medicare Advantage plans, Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs), and CHIP programs use prior authorization to control costs and make sure that treatments meet medical rules. This process is based on guidelines made by doctors and pharmacists. While prior authorization helps avoid unnecessary procedures and keeps patients safe, it can also delay important treatments because of paperwork, different rules from payers, and slow replies.
Providers often have to send many forms, call payers to check status, and manage appeals when requests are denied. Research shows only a small number of patients appeal prior authorization denials, even though 82% of such appeals in Medicare Advantage are at least partly approved. This gap often happens because patients and providers don’t know much about appeal rights or the complex processes.
To fix these problems, CMS made a new rule called the CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization final rule (CMS-0057-F). It starts January 1, 2026, with full API use required by January 1, 2027. This rule makes prior authorization faster with better digital tools like APIs.
APIs let computer systems used by insurers, providers, and patients share prior authorization information electronically and safely. Using certain APIs helps cut down on long manual communication and quickens approval times.
The rule requires four main APIs for payers like Medicare Advantage groups, state Medicaid and CHIP programs, and Qualified Health Plans on Federally Facilitated Exchanges (FFEs):
The CMS rule also shortens the time allowed for prior authorization decisions to help patients get care faster:
This applies to Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and CHIP but not to prior authorizations for drugs or most big employer health plans. Plans must give clear reasons for denials to help providers appeal or provide more documents fast.
CMS will also require payers to report yearly data on prior authorization. Reports will include how many approvals and denials happened, the average time to decide, and how many denials were overturned on appeal. This data helps providers check payer performance and improve the process.
For providers and medical practice managers handling Medicare and Medicaid patients, the CMS rule could reduce paperwork stress. Moving from manual to electronic processes with APIs means:
The new workflows may fit prior authorization activities better into clinical schedules and cut bottlenecks. But successful use means medical IT systems must support these APIs and staff need to learn how to use them.
Some challenges still exist for medical practices:
The shift to electronic prior authorization APIs fits well with chances for artificial intelligence (AI) and workflow automation to help manage healthcare tasks.
AI can automate tasks like:
Using AI with APIs cuts down on data entry mistakes and speeds up decisions. The Prior Authorization API works well with AI by supporting real-time communication between providers and payers. It can include automatic follow-ups or instant approvals for simple cases.
Automated workflows also:
The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) supports doctors and hospitals using these electronic and automated workflows because they can improve efficiency and keep care quality.
Health insurance plans in commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid markets are working voluntarily to make prior authorization simpler using technology. According to America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP):
Big insurers like Blue Cross Blue Shield, UnitedHealthcare, Humana, and CVS Health Aetna have promised to follow these rules. They want to make life easier for providers and improve patient care.
These changes, combined with CMS API rules and AI tools, are expected to save the healthcare system about $15 billion in ten years by cutting delays, reducing admin costs, and improving care coordination.
The prior authorization process helps keep patients safe, especially those on Medicaid who might have complicated health needs. It uses evidence-based rules and clear reviews to stop unnecessary or harmful procedures.
The CMS rule and wider use of APIs and automation aim to balance fast access to care with correct use of treatments. Electronic processes should lower the risk of patients waiting too long for needed treatments while letting payers keep responsible coverage rules.
The new regulations aim to standardize prior authorization processes across various health plans overseen by CMS, including Medicare Advantage and Medicaid, but not employer-sponsored plans. They focus on electronic processes and transparency to improve decision-making speed.
The final regulation mandates the use of four APIs to share critical information electronically, enabling providers, payers, and consumers to access necessary details about prior authorization, including approval statuses and requirements.
Medicare Advantage and Medicaid plans must make standard prior authorization decisions within 7 calendar days and expedited decisions within 72 hours. These requirements provide a tighter federal standard compared to previous rules.
Payers must provide information on what services require prior authorization, along with data about approval and denial rates, thereby allowing consumers to evaluate prior authorization practices and make informed choices.
The regulations do not address prior authorization for prescription drugs, large employer-sponsored plans, or how plans determine which services require prior authorization, leaving significant gaps in oversight and standardization.
CMS highlights that there has been slow patient utilization of the Patient Access API and notes the need for educational resources to inform consumers about how to use these features effectively.
The regulations provide limited information about the appeals process, such as the rate of appeals and specific reasons for initial denials, which may hinder consumers from effectively challenging prior authorization decisions.
By streamlining prior authorization processes and requiring clear communication on denials, the rules aim to reduce administrative burdens and confusion, potentially lowering claim denial rates for healthcare providers.
While the new electronic processes are designed to improve efficiency, challenges such as provider and patient engagement, education on new features, and data privacy concerns may hinder their broader effective use.
Future developments could include enhanced automation in decision-making, deeper integration of API functionalities in electronic health records, and ongoing legislative focus on reforming prior authorization practices.