Conversational agents, also called chatbots or virtual agents, are software programs that talk with patients using spoken or written language. They understand questions or requests and answer correctly by using language technology. In healthcare, these agents do tasks like answering common questions, checking symptoms to advise next steps, teaching patients about diseases or medicine, and managing appointments.
One benefit of these agents is that they work all the time. Unlike human staff who have limited hours and get tired, these agents can provide service 24/7. This is important in the U.S., where many healthcare providers get a lot of calls, have long wait times, and not enough staff. Chatbots can help reduce work for front-desk employees and give patients faster access to information.
Even with benefits, autonomous healthcare conversational agents have risks if not set up well. One worry is that these agents may miss or not respond properly to urgent medical problems, especially serious mental health issues like suicidal thoughts. If the system cannot notice emergency signs or fails to get a human involved on time, patients could be harmed or get delayed care.
Another problem comes from bias in the AI. These agents learn from data used when building them. If the data is not diverse or has mistakes, the agent’s answers might unfairly help or hurt some patient groups. This causes concerns about unequal care, especially in diverse U.S. communities. Biased AI might give worse advice or service to minority groups, making health gaps bigger.
Privacy is also a big challenge. Conversational agents collect private health information. This data must be kept safe following U.S. laws like HIPAA. But privacy rules can differ in other countries, making it hard to manage data for systems that work across states or globally. Healthcare leaders must make sure data storage, access, and sharing are well protected.
Access to technology is another issue. Many U.S. patients have internet and smartphones, but some poor or rural people might not have the devices or skills to use these agents. This could increase the gap in care access and needs careful attention.
Healthcare managers in the U.S. who want to use autonomous healthcare conversational agents should use a set of safety steps to reduce risks and protect patients.
Using conversational agents in front-office work can make healthcare offices in the U.S. run more smoothly. Automation can lower the amount of work for receptionists and call center workers. These agents handle tasks like scheduling appointments, checking patients in, verifying insurance, and answering common questions.
AI phone answering systems help by:
These automations use AI’s constant availability and capacity to handle many conversations at once. Still, to keep patients safe, any messages involving medical or sensitive info should offer a way to talk to a human expert when needed.
The U.S. has many different patient groups with different cultures, languages, and incomes. When using conversational agents, healthcare providers should design AI systems to respect these differences. If they don’t, the AI might make health gaps worse.
Ways to support fair access include:
Healthcare managers should watch how different groups use the AI and check health results. If they find gaps in service, they need to work with AI builders to fix these problems.
Experts like David D Luxton say there is a need for clear ethics rules that fit AI agents acting like or helping human health workers. New guidelines are needed to make sure conversational agents respect safety, dignity, and patient rights.
Groups such as the World Health Organization suggest setting up international teams to create ethics rules for AI in healthcare. These rules would include:
In the U.S., national groups like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) play important roles. They regulate AI in health and guide healthcare providers to use it safely.
Healthcare workers in the U.S. can benefit from autonomous conversational agents if those systems have good safety steps and rules. It is important to balance using new technology with making sure patient safety, fairness, honesty, and privacy come first. This helps avoid harm and builds trust in AI tools.
By using screening, monitoring, fair data practices, following privacy laws, and checking the systems often, healthcare leaders can add conversational AI in ways that help both office work and patient care. The main goal is for AI to support human care, make care easier to get, and improve service without risking safety or ethics.
Conversational agents are software programs that emulate human conversation via natural language. In healthcare, they provide information, counseling, mental health self-care, discharge planning, training simulations, and public health education. They interact with users through text or embodied virtual characters and can adapt emotionally to user needs, helping to address gaps in healthcare access, especially in underserved regions.
Conversational agents can be scaled affordably, are accessible anytime via the internet, and are not affected by fatigue or cognitive errors. They may reduce user anxiety discussing sensitive topics and can be culturally tailored to improve rapport and treatment adherence. This reliability and accessibility make them valuable in addressing healthcare shortages and disparities.
Bias risks arise from design preferences favoring certain racial or ethnic groups, algorithmic bias in training data due to missing or misclassified data, and programmer values influencing outcomes. Such biases can lead to unfair treatment or inaccurate predictions, exacerbating health disparities if diverse populations are not adequately represented in training and testing.
Inclusion of diverse population data during design and testing is essential. Continuous research and evaluation help identify biases and deficiencies in algorithms. Developers must consider demographic characteristics and specific user needs to prevent socioeconomic disparities, ensuring fair and equitable healthcare delivery across varied populations.
AI agents functioning autonomously may fail to recognize or properly handle high-risk scenarios like suicidal ideation. Patients with severe psychiatric or cognitive impairments may be unsuitable for their use. Without adequate safeguards, harmful outcomes or inadequate care referrals can occur.
Systems should screen users for suitability, disclose limitations transparently, and monitor conversations for safety risks. Automatic detection should trigger appropriate actions such as offering crisis resources or notifying human professionals for intervention and referrals to ensure user safety.
Conversational agents collect large volumes of sensitive data, raising significant privacy concerns. Privacy regulations vary internationally, complicating compliance. Without rigorous protections and user-informed consent on data use and limitations, users risk exposure of confidential health information, potentially causing harm.
Limited technological infrastructure, high costs, low technology literacy, and educational barriers contribute to unequal access, particularly in underserved communities and low-income countries. These limitations can widen healthcare disparities if not addressed in deployment strategies.
They should ensure safety, dignity, respect, and transparency toward users by developing new ethics codes and practical guidelines specific to AI care providers. Collaboration among stakeholders, including underserved populations, and regular evaluation and advocacy are vital to ethical deployment and adoption.
The WHO can coordinate an international working group to review and update ethical principles and guidelines for AI healthcare tools. This cooperative approach can promote standardized, ethical use worldwide, ensuring that benefits reach diverse populations while minimizing risks and disparities.