The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) is how Medicare pays doctors and healthcare providers for services under Medicare Part B. It has been used since 1992. The PFS sets payments based on Relative Value Units (RVUs). RVUs measure the doctor’s work, practice costs, and malpractice insurance. Payments are found by multiplying RVUs by a conversion factor and then adjusting for local cost differences.
Private practices that rely on Medicare need to watch these changes closely. Even small changes may affect how much money they make. For 2024, the Conversion Factor was increased to $33.29 per RVU, a 2.93% rise following the Consolidated Appropriations Act. However, changes planned for 2025 and 2026 might lower payments for some services.
In 2025, total Medicare physician payments are expected to drop by about 2.8%. This is mainly because the conversion factor will be lower. The 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule also focuses on care coordination, behavioral health services, transitional care management, and telehealth. These changes shift payment priorities. Practices should expect lower pay per work RVU, making compensation models based only on volume more difficult.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) shared the final rule for 2026. It continues to change payment rules. There will be a -2.5% adjustment to work RVUs to reflect productivity gains from new technology and automation. Also, a dual conversion factor starts in 2026. Qualifying Advanced Payment Model (APM) participants get a higher rate of $33.57, while others get $33.40.
CMS also updated practice expense values. Now, office-based medical practices are seen to have higher indirect costs than hospitals or other facilities. This reflects more doctors moving from private practice to hospitals. These updates may affect independent providers who face rising operating costs.
Telehealth became an important way to deliver medical care, especially after COVID-19. CMS recently removed some limits on how often certain inpatient and critical care visits can happen via telehealth. They also allow virtual supervision using two-way real-time video.
Still, CMS cut the payment rate closer to in-person visits for some telehealth procedure codes in 2025. This may hurt practices that rely a lot on virtual care.
CMS encourages better behavioral health integration with new add-on codes under Advanced Primary Care Management. These codes give extra Medicare payments for services like psychiatric Collaborative Care Models and behavioral health integration. This aligns with the growing role of mental health in primary care. Rural health clinics and federally qualified health centers have new policies for better payment transparency and coding.
Medicare’s fees are fixed, but private practices can still negotiate better payments from commercial insurers. Many insurers have fee schedules that may be old and pay less than a fair percentage of Medicare’s rates.
A good strategy starts with carefully analyzing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes that cover most services. These usually account for 75% or more of revenue charges. Next, identify the top payers who provide most of the reimbursements. This usually means three or four payers.
By comparing payer payments to Medicare rates with clear data, practices can find payment issues or underpayments.
For example, a doctor group in Virginia raised payments from 100% to 128% of Medicare rates over four years for key codes. They also got guaranteed 3% annual raises. Using solid data and focusing on high-volume codes can improve revenue even if Medicare payments stay flat or go down.
If talks fail, practices may drop contracts with low-paying insurers or limit new patients under those plans. This helps shift payer mixes to improve revenue.
Lower Medicare payments mean practices have to rethink how they pay providers to stay financially sound. Counting only work RVUs might not be enough because payments per unit are lower and quality reporting rules are tougher. The Quality Payment Program (QPP) sets higher bonus thresholds, pushing providers toward risk-based or Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APMs). This raises the challenge of balancing workload and pay.
Experts suggest combining RVU-based pay with other measures like patient satisfaction scores, panel sizes, quality indicators, and collection rates. Clear talk with providers about changing payments and compensation helps keep morale and acceptance.
Practices should also watch their payer mix and Medicare reliance closely. This helps spot money risks early and makes contract diversification possible. Asking for inflation adjustments in rates is important since costs keep rising but fees often do not.
Technology like artificial intelligence (AI) and workflow automation can help private practices adjust to Medicare’s changes. These tools improve administrative work and revenue management.
Simbo AI offers tools for front-office phone automation. This can reduce missed appointments, help patients access care better, and capture charges more accurately. All this helps get more money under strict fee schedules.
AI can help managers organize payer data, track CPT code payments, and build reports to find negotiation chances. Automating front-desk work lowers administrative load, letting staff focus on coding, compliance, and patient coordination.
AI also helps run telehealth services by scheduling, documenting, and ensuring correct coding. This lowers claim denials and payment delays. With CMS focusing on telehealth and chronic care, AI tools give an edge to manage revenue despite payment drops.
AI analytics can also track chronic and behavioral health billing by finding eligible patients and monitoring care plans. These tools fit Medicare’s move toward value-based care and new payment incentives.
Medicare fee rules change often, so practices should watch out for local differences. Geographic practice cost indices (GPCIs) affect payments. Rural and underserved areas may get more telehealth payments and new billing options through behavioral health codes supported by CMS.
Practice costs in offices tend to be higher than in hospitals. Administrators should know that more doctors work for hospitals now. Still, many want to keep control and independence in private practice settings.
About 75% of doctors now work for companies, so independent practices face revenue challenges. They need strong payer negotiation, mixed compensation plans, and better technology to stay open and provide good care.
Medicare’s Physician Fee Schedule keeps changing, which makes it harder for private medical practices to stay financially stable. Lower payments in 2025, efficiency cuts in 2026, and a shift to value-based care create new challenges. Practices should rethink how they pay providers, improve revenue cycle management, and negotiate better contracts.
Technology like AI-powered automation, such as Simbo AI’s tools, can help with these changes. Keeping up with Medicare’s coding, billing, and service rules needs smart plans and active work from healthcare leaders and staff.
Success for private medical practices in the US depends on using data for negotiations, careful pay models, and new technology to improve work and income in a changing Medicare system.
The introduction of RBRVS and national fee schedules by Medicare has reduced practices’ ability to increase income via fee hikes, as most health plans now operate on fixed fee schedules with little relation to current Medicare rates.
The first step is to perform a thorough analysis of CPT codes and reimbursement rates, focusing on the codes that account for a significant portion of total practice charges, typically 75%.
Practices should determine their top payers and focus negotiation efforts on the three to four that make up the bulk of their reimbursements.
Solid data on the reimbursement rates for each CPT code from various payers, along with a comparison to Medicare rates, is crucial for establishing a solid negotiation position.
Practices can leverage discrepancies where lower reimbursement is observed for certain codes or under certain plans to negotiate for higher rates.
Organizing data into spreadsheets helps identify inequities in reimbursement rates and target specific codes for negotiation, enhancing overall negotiating power.
Practices can negotiate individual fees, consider dropping plans with low reimbursement rates, or stop accepting new patients covered by those plans.
If initial negotiations do not yield significant improvements, practices may consider maintaining a stance of reevaluating after a set period or adjusting fee structures accordingly.
By presenting a detailed analysis showing the comparison of their fees and the reimbursement rates from payers versus Medicare, practices can support their argument effectively.
Dramatic increases in healthcare costs are likely to face resistance, making it essential for practices to effectively negotiate for fair reimbursement to keep pace with rising costs.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
