Research from a comprehensive scoping review of healthcare access in OECD countries, including the U.S., shows that distance and travel time strongly influence healthcare service use in rural areas. The review analyzed 1,418 articles from 1993 to 2023 and found 135 studies that met strict criteria for analysis. Out of these, 83.7 percent provided evidence of “distance and travel time decay”—a decrease in healthcare use as travel distance and time increase.
For rural residents, travel times as short as 30 minutes or distances around 16.1 kilometers (approximately 10 miles) can significantly reduce the chances of visiting healthcare facilities. More specialized medical services often require even longer travel—sometimes over 60 minutes or 90-100 kilometers (55-62 miles)—which further widens access gaps. This is concerning since rural populations tend to need specialist care more frequently due to higher rates of chronic illnesses and complex conditions.
In U.S. rural areas, limited transportation options make these challenges worse. About 10.6 percent of older adults in rural communities report canceling or delaying medical appointments because of transportation costs or availability. These missed appointments often lead to more emergency room visits, poorer health outcomes, and higher costs for patients and healthcare systems alike.
Distance measured in kilometers is a simple metric, but travel time may better capture access challenges in rural areas. Travel time includes factors like road conditions, traffic, and transportation availability, which influence healthcare-seeking behavior more than distance alone.
For example, two patients may live 25 miles from the nearest hospital, but one might have a 30-minute highway drive while the other faces an hour-long trip on poorly maintained roads with unreliable transportation. The patient with the longer travel time faces greater barriers to care, which can affect healthcare use.
Healthcare planners and administrators can allocate resources and design outreach programs more effectively by considering travel time. This approach is especially important in states with large rural populations such as Texas, North Carolina, and Tennessee, where hospital closures and service shortages have expanded access gaps.
Older adults in rural areas face specific challenges in obtaining healthcare. Chronic conditions like diabetes and limited mobility often require frequent visits to distant specialists. Research from Saskatchewan, Canada, shows similar difficulties, with many older rural residents relying on community support like family and volunteer drivers to attend appointments.
The lack of reliable transportation leads to appointment cancellations, worsening health outcomes. Older adults living in senior facilities often report poorer health and have greater caregiving needs, which makes access to specialist services even more difficult.
Addressing these issues requires targeted efforts to improve transportation, increase local specialist availability, and use technology to reduce distance-related barriers.
The shortage of healthcare providers in rural areas reduces access and adds pressure on the providers who remain. Primary care physicians often cover large areas, limiting appointment availability and continuity of care.
Mobile health clinics and critical access hospitals provide some relief by bringing services closer to isolated communities. Still, they face challenges such as limited funding, difficulties in recruiting staff, and technological infrastructure issues.
Lower Medicare reimbursement rates also affect the financial stability of rural hospitals and clinics. This leads to service reductions or closures, forcing patients to travel further for care.
Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and automated workflows in healthcare administration presents opportunities to ease some access issues in rural practices.
For example, companies like Simbo AI provide front-office phone automation designed for healthcare. Automating call handling, appointment scheduling, and patient questions helps improve engagement and cuts down on missed appointments, especially when human resources are limited.
Rural practices often have long phone wait times while administrative staff balance large call volumes and clinical duties. AI technology manages calls efficiently, allowing timely responses that help patients confirm or reschedule appointments and find information without being on hold. This is crucial for older patients who may prefer phone contact over digital scheduling.
Distance and transportation obstacles cause frequent cancellations and missed visits. AI-powered systems can send automated reminders by calls or texts, check transportation needs, and make rescheduling easier. These efforts lower no-show rates, improve staff workflows, and protect revenue for rural practices.
Telehealth has improved access in rural areas, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. However, issues like limited broadband and technical skills remain. AI tools can simplify telehealth setup, fix connection problems, and help patients prepare for virtual visits, reducing barriers that slow telehealth use.
Automating the scheduling of in-person and virtual visits helps staff manage hybrid care models better. AI can also optimize provider schedules by balancing specialist appointments that require physical presence with those that can happen remotely.
Healthcare administrators and IT managers working in rural medical practices should consider several operational steps based on these findings:
Each of these steps requires planning and IT readiness but can improve healthcare access for rural populations.
Distance and travel time continue to be key factors affecting healthcare access in rural America. They influence patient health and the sustainability of rural healthcare systems. While geography itself cannot be changed, healthcare delivery and administration can adapt. By using data-driven planning, technology automation, and community support, medical practices can reduce travel burdens and make healthcare more available to rural patients.
Distance can significantly hinder access to healthcare services for rural residents, often requiring long travel times to obtain necessary care.
Travel time is often a more accurate indicator of healthcare access challenges than distance alone, highlighting the real burden on rural populations.
Specialist healthcare services typically necessitate greater travel distances compared to generalist services for rural residents.
The review analyzed published research articles from five databases, focusing on studies from OECD countries between 1993 and mid-2023.
A total of 1418 articles were identified, with 135 meeting the inclusion criteria for the review.
Approximately 83.7% of the studies reviewed demonstrated evidence of distance and/or travel time decay affecting healthcare access.
Distance and travel time decay emphasize the diminishing likelihood of accessing healthcare services as distances increase.
Understanding travel time can help inform health service planning and accessibility strategies for rural and remote populations.
More well-designed studies are necessary to clarify the factors influencing rural residents’ travel behaviors for healthcare services.
The findings highlight that Texas, with its rural communities, may also face similar healthcare access challenges due to distance and travel time.