AI projects are often complicated. They involve many groups and people, called stakeholders. Stakeholders can be project owners, managers, teams, workers, and even those who do not directly use the AI system, sometimes called passive stakeholders. Research by Gloria J. Miller in Project Leadership and Society (2022) says that project owners, managers, and teams must take moral and ethical responsibility for the AI they create. This means they should recognize the possible harms AI might cause to people or communities.
AI is different from other projects because it can affect many people outside the direct users. Passive stakeholders, like patients in healthcare or junior staff who may not have a say in AI decisions, can be greatly affected. Miller’s research suggests that project leaders should include passive stakeholder representatives early in the planning. This helps make sure concerns are handled before the AI system is used. Such a step avoids harm and supports a fairer AI implementation.
Good stakeholder engagement means including both active participants who build and run AI systems and passive participants who feel its effects. Medical administrators and IT managers can gain from managing these roles well. They should create clear communication and ways to get feedback during the AI deployment process.
A recent study of 428 firms in different sectors across the United States shows AI integration improves business results and sustainability. Sustainability means running a business that is good for the environment and society while staying able to continue over time.
This benefit is important especially for small- and medium-sized businesses, including many medical offices and healthcare providers. These groups often find it hard to balance costs with patient care. The study combined surveys and interviews to confirm that AI use connects positively to sustainability and business success.
However, the study found two main key points. First, the level of stakeholder engagement matters. Second, overcoming barriers to adoption is important. When all stakeholders take part and work together, AI works better. But problems with technology or resistance inside organizations can reduce AI’s benefits.
Healthcare organizations aiming to use AI for front-office phone automation, like systems by Simbo AI, should involve workers early. From receptionists to IT staff, addressing worries quickly leads to better acceptance and performance.
Even with benefits, many healthcare providers face problems when putting AI in use. Barriers can be technological, such as conflicts with current software. They can also be organizational, like unwillingness to change old workflows. Human factors also matter, including fears about job loss or not having the needed AI knowledge.
For medical administrators and IT managers, knowing these barriers is the first step. They should plan a slow, step-by-step method to add AI. The research stresses fixing these issues one step at a time instead of rushing AI use. Training, trial runs, and planning sessions that include stakeholders help decrease resistance and reveal hidden problems early.
For example, when adding Simbo AI’s phone automation, a phased plan might start with sending simple patient questions to AI. Receptionist teams would give feedback on how well it works. Later, more complex tasks can move to AI, making sure the change is smooth without hurting staff confidence or patient care.
In healthcare, workflows are often complex and have many steps, especially for tasks like scheduling appointments and talking with patients. AI workflow automation helps by making these steps easier. It lowers manual work and makes information more accurate. AI tools such as Simbo AI’s answering service can answer phone calls, reply to patient questions, book appointments, and send reminders.
Stakeholders here include front-office staff handling phones, IT teams supporting AI systems, healthcare workers making care decisions, and patients who get the services. Each group has different views and interests in AI use. For example:
Medical practices that involve all these stakeholders build trust and teamwork. This helps AI-driven workflow automation succeed.
Medical administrators and IT managers can use several strategies to make AI adoption work well:
Introducing AI slowly is key in healthcare because mistakes or interruptions can seriously affect patient care and safety. A step-by-step approach lets teams change workflows, improve system accuracy, and train staff well.
This method also gets workers at all levels involved. This helps reduce fears about job loss or change caused by automation. For example, beginning with call routing lets receptionists get used to how AI and humans work together without losing control over patient communication.
Also, phased adoption makes it easier to check AI’s compliance with healthcare rules like HIPAA. Finding privacy issues early helps keep patient data safe, which is essential for healthcare providers.
Using AI offers clear business benefits for medical offices. Besides making administration better, AI can cut down missed appointments and improve patient satisfaction by giving 24/7 access to information and services.
Research shows AI helps business by lowering costs and improving sustainability. This suits healthcare sectors with tight budgets and high demand. AI tools like Simbo AI automate routine tasks, so medical staff can focus more on patient care instead of paperwork.
Practices that involve stakeholders at all levels usually find AI adoption easier and cheaper. This involvement results in better workflows where AI fits naturally into daily work. That improves both worker happiness and patient experience.
People who manage healthcare facilities in the US should see AI adoption not just as a tech upgrade but as a change involving many people with different roles and views.
Studies show that engaging both active and passive stakeholders is needed for ethical, moral, and business success. Also, dealing with barriers and planning AI in phases are practical ways to make sure AI improves healthcare services and keeps operations running well.
By thinking carefully about who the stakeholders are and involving them early and often, medical practices can improve their patient communication and front-office work with AI tools like Simbo AI, helping both the business and patient care.
The study aims to investigate how artificial intelligence (AI) integration in service delivery influences sustainability and business performance in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) across diverse sectors.
A mixed-methods approach combining survey data from 428 firms and qualitative insights from 20 semistructured interviews was utilized. Partial least squares structural equation modeling tested the hypothesized relationships.
AI integration significantly improves both sustainability and business performance, with stakeholder engagement enhancing its positive impact and adoption barriers weakening business outcomes.
Sustainability performance partially mediates the relationship between AI integration and business outcomes, highlighting its strategic importance.
SMEs should adopt phased strategies for AI integration, engage stakeholders proactively, and address both technological and organizational barriers to maximize AI’s effectiveness.
Stakeholder engagement strengthens the positive effect of AI on sustainability outcomes, thereby enhancing overall business performance.
The study identifies technological and organizational barriers that can weaken the impact of AI on business performance.
The research encompassed SMEs across four diverse sectors, although specific sectors are not detailed in the abstract.
It advances the AI literature by linking AI adoption to dual sustainability and business benefits while examining the moderating effects of engagement and barriers.
The originality lies in offering a sector-sensitive, empirically grounded model of AI-enabled transformation in SMEs, which is an area previously underexplored.