Long-term care homes provide important services to older adults and people with chronic health problems who need constant help. The US long-term care sector is under stress for many reasons. The population is getting older, which means people need more complex care. At the same time, many workers are leaving because they are tired, retiring, or choosing different jobs. Research shows that these problems make it important to find new technology to help human caregivers.
AI robots and other AI tools can help solve some of these problems. They support care that focuses on the individual needs and preferences of residents. For example, AI can help with daily tasks, watch health conditions, schedule appointments, and give reminders. This lets healthcare staff spend more time directly caring for people.
Even though AI has benefits, healthcare providers in long-term care have worries that slow down its use. Three main problems have been found:
If AI is to be used successfully in long-term care, these problems must be addressed carefully.
Future studies in the United States need to focus on understanding and solving the challenges healthcare workers face with AI. There are three main topics to study:
Good and ongoing training programs are needed to make staff comfortable and familiar with AI robots. Research should look at what kinds of training work best, such as hands-on workshops, peer support, or online lessons. Training should also fit different staff roles and education levels.
Continuous technical support is also important. If healthcare workers know they can get help easily when they have AI problems, they might be more confident using new technology.
Ethical worries about AI in long-term care need more attention. Research should include healthcare workers in talks about how to use AI properly, limits for automation, and data privacy rules. This approach builds trust by making sure AI is designed and used with caregivers’ advice and for the well-being of residents.
Studies should also look at how AI affects jobs in the long term. They can see if fears about losing jobs are true and find ways to balance human and machine roles well.
Research on money matters should look for ways to pay for AI in different long-term care homes. Smaller homes, especially in rural or poor areas, often do not get enough funding. Research on AI solutions that can work with current systems and cost less to keep will help wider use.
Studies might also look into government or private funding programs, payment support through Medicare or Medicaid, and partnerships with tech companies to lower costs for long-term care providers.
The articles reviewed show that healthcare providers’ views are key for AI to work well. Without their approval and help, AI tools might not work as planned or could be rejected.
Research on methods like the Person-Centered Practice Framework shows that involving providers in designing, adjusting, and testing AI can lead to better results. This method focuses on both residents’ and workers’ needs and adjusts technology to fit those needs.
Future work should look at how long-term care managers, IT leaders, and nursing staff can work together to make AI part of everyday care routines smoothly while keeping good care traditions.
Strong policies at the federal and state levels can help bring AI into long-term care homes.
One big policy issue is making sure data collected by AI in long-term care is safe and used correctly. Policymakers should create clear rules that protect resident privacy but also allow helpful data sharing to improve care.
AI often uses sensitive health information. If policies are unclear, providers might not trust or want to use AI.
Financial incentives like grants, tax breaks, or low-cost loans can encourage long-term care homes to invest in AI. Policymakers could also include AI use in programs that reward better care and quality improvement.
Rules that set standards for choosing, using, and checking AI tools will help care homes make smart decisions. Such standards should include ways to measure AI safety, performance, and ease of use over time.
Programs that support openness and comparison can encourage care homes to improve while staying responsible.
Using AI goes beyond helping patients directly with robots. AI can also improve how care homes run their day-to-day work.
One area is AI phone systems that manage many calls from residents, families, and staff. These systems can handle scheduling, appointment confirmations, medication refills, and general questions. This reduces work for office staff and cuts down mistakes.
For US care home managers and owners, using AI for communication can improve response times and make residents happier without adding more staff. Automated phone systems also work outside regular office hours, which many homes cannot cover.
AI can help write and manage clinical documents by transcribing notes, flagging important information, and creating reports. This saves time for nurses and office staff and helps keep records accurate and follow rules.
Automation cuts down repeated work and delays so caregivers have more time to care for residents.
AI tools that study resident needs and predict care demands can help plan staff schedules better. This can lower extra work costs and reduce staff burnout. For US care homes facing staff shortages, AI-based scheduling can improve how workers are managed.
AI shows promise for long-term care in the United States, but fully using it is complicated. Future studies must focus on healthcare providers’ worries and include their opinions in making new tools. Education, clear ethical rules, and affordable AI options are needed to support AI use.
At the same time, policymakers should set clear rules, protect privacy, and offer financial help based on the needs of long-term care homes. Together, these efforts can improve resident-centered care, boost work efficiency, and help care homes keep up with the growing number of older adults.
For medical practice administrators, care home owners, and IT managers, understanding these research directions helps with better planning. By staying involved and aware, they can make sure AI tools are used safely and well to support both caregivers and residents in the changing world of long-term care.
Long-term care homes are increasingly challenged by rising care needs among residents and a shortage of healthcare providers.
AI-enabled robots have the potential to address care needs and support person-centered care in long-term care homes.
Three main barriers include perceived technical complexity, doubts regarding usefulness and ethical concerns, and resource limitations.
Strategies include accommodating the needs of residents, increasing understanding of robot benefits, addressing safety issues, and providing training.
The review aimed to explore literature on healthcare providers’ perspectives regarding AI-enabled robot adoption in long-term care.
The review included 33 articles that met the inclusion criteria.
The findings were compared with the Person-Centered Practice Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Including healthcare providers’ voices is crucial for the successful implementation of AI-enabled robots in care settings.
Ethical concerns include the impact of automation on job roles, privacy issues, and the overall effectiveness in enhancing care.
Future research should focus on addressing healthcare provider concerns and developing supportive policies for AI integration in care homes.