Triage is very important in the emergency department. It helps sort patients based on how urgent their health problems are. Patients are usually grouped into levels of seriousness to guide treatment decisions. But long wait times during triage can make the emergency room crowded, lead to worse patient results, and cause stress for the staff. In many U.S. hospitals, wait times in triage can be 15 to 20 minutes or even longer. This depends on how many patients arrive and how many staff are available.
There are several reasons for these long waits:
To fix these problems, hospitals need a careful method that finds and solves blockages, tests changes, measures results, and keeps improving over time. This is a good fit for Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.
The PDSA cycle follows four clear steps. It helps test changes in real life quickly and well:
This cycle lets teams try small tests instead of big changes all at once. That lowers risks and helps teams make choices based on facts.
Singapore General Hospital used PDSA cycles between 2017 and 2019 to lower triage wait times. They get over 125,000 emergency patients each year. Their goal was to cut wait times from 18 minutes down to 10 minutes.
Some of their efforts included:
Results were:
Though the 10-minute goal was not fully met, steady improvements were made. The study showed that having enough staff is very important.
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center also used PDSA cycles to speed up a fast-track program for less urgent patients. Before, these patients waited about six hours in the emergency room. After four PDSA cycles, the wait dropped to about 1 hour and 47 minutes. Changes included faster registration, better places for patients, and more teamwork among doctors, nurses, and technicians. The changes also stopped placing very sick patients in the fast-track area by mistake.
These examples show how testing changes step by step, involving everyone, and using data can help fix emergency room problems. Hospitals in the U.S. can use these ideas too.
Many studies say that good staffing plans are very important for faster triage. There should be enough nurses when many patients arrive during the day. Differences in nurses’ experience can lead to inconsistent decisions. This can be helped by roles like triage nurse clinicians who mentor and monitor quality.
Good staffing also means putting the best triage nurses on duty at the busiest times. It helps if other staff handle tasks that are not triage, so triage nurses can focus only on assessing patients.
Hospital managers need to watch staffing, patient arrivals, and workflow problems all the time. PDSA cycles are a good way to test different staffing plans without hurting patient care.
Besides staffing, changing processes also helps triage run better. Combining patient registration with triage means patients get assessed as soon as they arrive. Dividing waiting areas by how sick patients are can help control infection, make patients more comfortable, and reduce overcrowding.
Some hospitals allow certain patients to skip formal triage and go straight to treatment beds if their cases are clear or urgent. This lowers crowding in triage and lets doctors treat patients faster.
Clear triage criteria that all nurses use can reduce personal differences. It also helps train newer nurses to work with more confidence. Regular checks and feedback, guided by PDSA cycles, help make triage better over time.
Keeping triage improvements going requires involving all who work there and making decisions based on data. Getting input from nurses, doctors, and support staff shows where problems are and what fixes might work. Working with clinical leaders and IT staff helps bring in new technology, staffing models, and monitoring tools.
Collecting accurate data on patient arrival times, wait times, triage levels, and how patients move through the system gives solid facts for testing changes. Sharing results openly helps create a culture of continuous improvement.
Looking forward, AI and automation can help emergency departments improve triage. Although doctors and nurses still make the final judgments, AI can quickly analyze lots of patient data. It can predict how serious cases are and suggest triage categories.
AI tools can do quick screening of less urgent patients. They can guide these patients to other care options or give them lower priority, which reduces crowding. These systems also help make triage decisions more consistent by reducing differences caused by nurses’ experience. Early alerts from AI can spot very sick patients fast.
Automation can also help match staff to patient loads by studying real-time data. It can adjust nurse assignments and how units work. Smart tracking systems notify staff if delays happen, allowing quick fixes.
For example, some companies create AI-powered phone systems that help with patient intake and triage communication. This speeds up registration and safely sends information to electronic health records and triage teams.
Adding AI requires careful planning, staff training, and ongoing checks using methods like PDSA cycles to stay safe and effective. Combined with human judgment, AI and automation can further cut wait times, improve patient flow, and make work better for staff.
Hospital managers and clinic owners in the U.S. who want to use PDSA cycles to improve triage should consider these steps:
By using PDSA cycles with clear focus on staffing, process changes, data, and technology, emergency departments and clinics in the United States can steadily reduce triage wait times and improve patient care. The cycle’s step-by-step nature helps them adjust to new demands while keeping ongoing quality improvements. AI and workflow automation offer new ways to support healthcare teams in managing emergency care effectively.
The primary goal is to enhance the overall efficiency of patient flow, reducing congestion and wait times, which ultimately leads to improved patient care and experience in emergency departments.
A series of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were implemented to identify and address key issues affecting wait times, allowing for targeted interventions.
The baseline average wait time to triage was 18 minutes, which was reduced to 13 minutes post-implementation, reflecting a 28% improvement.
Staffing was identified as a critical factor; inconsistent triage nurse availability aligned with patient arrival trends often led to prolonged wait times.
‘Eyeball’ triage involves quick assessments by senior nurses to identify patients needing immediate care, facilitating faster patient transfers to care areas.
The triage nurse clinician role served to guide less experienced nurses and ensure adequate staffing, which improved triage efficiency.
Key upstream processes included patient registration and triaging, both of which occur before patient consultation by doctors.
Systemic issues included limited physical space in the triage area and insufficient ancillary staff to assist with non-triage-related tasks during peak periods.
Standardized triage criteria were implemented to reduce variability in outcomes, ensuring faster and more consistent triage decisions.
Reducing non-urgent point of care tests and exploring the implementation of AI-infused triage assistants were recommended to enhance efficiency further.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
