Discrimination in AI, often called algorithmic bias or algorithmic racism, happens when AI systems give unfair results for groups based on race, ethnicity, gender, or other traits. This bias mainly comes from the data used to train AI models. If the data does not fairly represent different groups, AI might misclassify people or suggest treatments that don’t work well or could harm some groups. For example, an AI trained mostly with data from white patients might work worse for patients of color.
Joy Buolamwini, a computer scientist, showed in her 2016 TED Talk that if datasets lack diversity, AI systems will have trouble recognizing faces or health patterns outside the main group’s norms. This can cause unfair healthcare advice and sometimes make health differences worse.
These problems are very important in the U.S. healthcare system, where fair care is a goal. AI discrimination could break ethical rules and legal laws against discrimination. Google’s Vision AI once gave racist results, which raised public concern and led to efforts to control fairness in AI.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) works to regulate AI in healthcare, focusing on patient privacy and security through HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act). HIPAA started in 1996 and has not yet been updated for modern AI.
Wendell Bartnick and Vicki Tankle from Reed Smith LLP say AI use is allowed if current laws are followed. The HHS set up an AI task force as part of the White House’s Executive Order 14110 (2023). This task force promotes safety, privacy, transparency, and following rules in healthcare AI.
The task force watches for clinical mistakes caused by AI and protects health data privacy. They plan ways to handle AI’s use of protected health information (PHI). They divide PHI use into low and high risk, based on how easy it is to identify patients. Allowed uses include treatment planning, payment, research with patient consent, and operations, as long as humans stay involved.
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) also influences global thinking on AI ethics. Its “Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence” lists core values like human rights, diversity, privacy, transparency, and human oversight. These can guide U.S. healthcare providers using AI.
Gabriela Ramos, UNESCO’s Assistant Director-General, warns that ethical limits are needed to stop AI from increasing real-world bias or discrimination. She says AI should not have full control without human judgment.
One main cause of bias is a lack of diversity in training data for AI. To reduce bias based on race, ethnicity, and gender, healthcare groups should try to use data that shows the full range of their patient populations.
Working with community groups can help get more complete, balanced data. Also, synthetic data, which is artificially created to balance different groups, is a new way to add to real data and reduce gaps in AI training.
Fairness-aware machine learning means changing AI models to address bias. This includes:
Healthcare AI creators who use these methods can build fairer systems. This helps avoid favoring certain groups over others in clinical choices.
Keeping humans responsible for AI decisions is very important. Ethical AI review boards, made up of people with different racial, ethnic, and professional backgrounds, should regularly check AI models for bias and suggest fixes. These boards promote accountability and openness. They make sure AI stays a support tool and not a full decision maker.
Healthcare institutions should also teach doctors and staff to spot bias in AI results. Training on recognizing hidden bias in technology is helpful.
AI in healthcare must give results that doctors and patients can understand. Transparency means AI shows how it makes decisions or suggestions, while still protecting patient privacy.
Explainable AI helps admins decide if the advice is fair or biased. Global standards, including UNESCO’s ethical AI guidelines, say transparency is key to building trust.
You cannot just install AI systems and forget about them. Healthcare AI must be checked often for bias and accuracy.
User feedback allows patients and providers to report AI mistakes or bias. This leads to re-evaluation. Regular legal audits make sure AI follows anti-discrimination laws like Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act.
Tools like IBM’s AI Fairness 360 Toolkit and Microsoft’s Fairlearn give healthcare groups software to find and reduce bias continuously.
Front-office parts of healthcare practices now use AI for automating tasks to improve efficiency and patient interaction. Simbo AI offers AI systems for phone automation and answering services that lower admin work while following rules and patient privacy.
Well-designed AI phone systems can cut down human mistakes in scheduling, patient questions, and insurance approvals. But healthcare IT managers must make sure AI workflows do not cause bias or discrimination by:
Good management of AI front-office tools protects patients and makes operations better by lowering missed appointments and billing errors, which can hurt underserved groups more.
Making fair healthcare AI systems needs teamwork beyond single groups. Multi-stakeholder governance means including health systems, AI makers, regulators, patient advocates, and legal experts. This helps bring many views into AI policies and technology.
The HHS AI task force and international groups like UNESCO’s Women4Ethical AI platform show this approach. Women4Ethical AI works on gender equality in AI through 17 global experts who support inclusive, non-discriminatory AI.
U.S. healthcare providers can gain from joining similar ethics boards or coalitions that focus on fairness and rule-following in AI use.
Medical practice managers and IT staff who want to start or keep AI should think about these steps for U.S. healthcare:
By using these steps carefully, healthcare groups can lower discrimination risks and give fairer care with AI tools.
Through careful building, using, and watching AI systems, U.S. healthcare providers can handle problems caused by bias and discrimination. Proper safety steps and inclusive data use make AI help patient care and running healthcare better while protecting people’s rights and dignity.
AI has been used in healthcare for years, supporting providers and improving data management, treatment planning, and patient outcomes.
HIPAA, enacted in 1996, regulates the use of protected health information (PHI), but it is outdated and does not directly cover AI technologies.
HHS has created an AI task force to address privacy, safety, and security and is working to streamline regulations regarding AI in healthcare.
PHI use in AI is generally categorized into low risk and high risk, depending on how individually identifiable information is used.
The AI task force focuses on developing a strategic plan for AI, including monitoring clinical errors and ensuring privacy and security.
Permissible uses include treatment, payment, healthcare operations activities, research with permission, and using de-identified information.
Current regulations are often seen as inadequate due to technology’s rapid evolution, necessitating updated guidelines to address AI challenges.
Practices should focus on maintaining human oversight, ensuring adherence to existing laws, and utilizing HHS guidelines for AI governance.
The Executive Order mandates HHS to prioritize safety, privacy, and compliance while promoting AI investment and addressing its impact on health data.
HHS has increased focus on ensuring AI does not contribute to discrimination, emphasizing education and enforcement of non-discrimination laws.