AI can look at a lot of medical data fast. It can help doctors make better diagnoses and improve how clinics run. For example, AI can help read x-rays or guess how a patient might do in the future. These tasks usually take a lot of time and skill from doctors. But the relationship between patients and doctors is not just about facts. It depends a lot on trust, care, and good communication.
Recent research shows many Americans are wary about AI in healthcare. A survey in December 2022 with over 11,000 adults said 60% of people feel uneasy if their doctor uses AI to diagnose or decide treatment. Only 39% said they are okay with it. This may happen because people worry that AI could make healthcare less personal and more like just data.
Over half of the people surveyed (57%) said they are worried AI could harm the bond between patient and doctor. Patients fear their visits will feel cold and mechanical. Empathy, trust, and care made just for the person are hard to replace with machines. Many want human choices involved in their care.
One difficulty is that some AI systems work in a way that even doctors cannot easily explain. These are called “black-box” algorithms. Doctors and patients may not know why the AI makes certain decisions. This makes it hard to have open talks and can cause patients to trust less.
Doctors also face challenges. AI is made to help with decisions, but doctors must explain what AI says in a way patients can understand. They also need to make sure that treatments match what each patient wants and needs.
People worry not only about less personal care but also about fairness. AI is trained on data, and if the data is biased or missing information, AI might give worse advice to some racial or ethnic groups. Research published by Elsevier says AI could make these health gaps bigger by giving wrong or weaker recommendations.
Still, the same Pew survey showed that 51% of people who see racial bias in health think AI might help reduce unfair treatment. This means AI, if made carefully, could help make healthcare fairer by making decisions more consistent and avoiding human mistakes or bias.
But this good side of AI needs to be balanced with ethics. AI must use data from many diverse groups and be checked often to avoid causing new problems.
Despite worries, AI can help doctors by taking over some paperwork and giving them more time with patients. A study in late 2023 showed that AI scribes saved doctors almost 15,800 hours of writing notes over 63 weeks. This means less work after hours and more time talking face-to-face with patients.
Doctors using these scribes said communication got better and they felt happier in their jobs. Patients noticed doctors looked at screens less and talked more. In fact, 56% of patients said this made their visits better.
For leaders and IT managers, this shows AI is not only useful for tests and diagnosis but also for making work easier. When used right, AI scribes can bring back parts of care that technology might otherwise weaken.
People’s feelings about AI in healthcare vary with the use. For example, 65% of adults agree with using AI for skin cancer checks and think it makes diagnosis better. This shows trust is growing for AI in spotting patterns and visuals.
However, fewer people, only 40%, feel okay with AI helping in surgery with robots. Even fewer accept AI chatbots for mental health help. In fact, 79% do not want to rely only on AI for therapy. Many think AI should be used with human providers, so care stays personal and kind.
These results tell us that when using AI in healthcare, patient comfort and the kind of care matter. Trust needs to be built case by case.
Using AI in clinics is not simple. It means solving problems with technology, how clinics work, how doctors feel, and how patients see AI.
Research says just giving doctors less paperwork with AI does not always improve patient relationships. If clinics still rush visits, have too many patients, or if doctors are not comfortable talking about feelings, then saved time may not help.
Health leaders and IT teams must work with doctors to make sure AI helps build better patient connections instead of just speeding things up and hurting relationships.
Training doctors is very important. They need to learn how to talk, show care, and build trust, especially when using AI data. Starting training early, giving feedback often, and helping avoid burnout can prepare doctors to use AI without losing the human side.
Besides helping with medical decisions, AI can also improve how front desks and offices work. Simbo AI is a company that uses AI to answer phones and manage appointments. This kind of AI helps reduce the work at the front desk.
By handling routine calls, appointment setup, and basic sorting of patients, Simbo AI makes work easier for staff. The automated service can answer questions fast, send reminders, and send tricky calls to the right person.
Medical administrators get several benefits from this:
When used together with clinical AI, front-office automation helps clinics work better and lets doctors spend more time caring for patients.
Health leaders must balance AI benefits with patient-focused care. Ways to keep the human part of healthcare while using AI include:
Medical leaders in the U.S. must look closely when bringing in AI to keep care quality, patient trust, and smooth operations. Important points to think about are:
Artificial intelligence will keep changing healthcare in the U.S. With careful use and leaders focused on keeping patient-doctor connection, clinics can use AI tools while holding on to the personal care patients need.
Technologies like Simbo AI’s phone automation and AI scribes can help make workflows smoother and reduce doctor burnout. But these must be managed carefully so they support, not replace, human connections valued by patients and doctors.
By teaching doctors, involving patients, and using AI openly and ethically, healthcare leaders and IT staff can guide their organizations through challenges in digital health and protect the important human side of care.
60% of U.S. adults report feeling uncomfortable if their healthcare provider used AI for diagnosis and treatment recommendations, while 39% said they would be comfortable.
Only 38% believe AI would improve health outcomes by diagnosing diseases and recommending treatments, 33% think it would worsen outcomes, and 27% see little to no difference.
40% of Americans think AI use in healthcare would reduce mistakes made by providers, whereas 27% believe it would increase mistakes, and 31% expect no significant change.
Among those who recognize racial and ethnic bias as an issue, 51% believe AI would help reduce this bias, 15% think it would worsen it, and about one-third expect no change.
A majority, 57%, believe AI would deteriorate the personal connection between patients and providers, whereas only 13% think it would improve this relationship.
Men, younger adults, and individuals with higher education levels are more open to AI in healthcare, but even among these groups, around half or more still express discomfort.
Most Americans (65%) would want AI used for skin cancer screening, viewing it as a medical advance, while fewer are comfortable with AI-driven surgery robots, pain management AI, or mental health chatbots.
About 40% would want AI robots used in their surgery, 59% would not; those familiar with these robots largely see them as a medical advance, whereas lack of familiarity leads to greater rejection.
79% of U.S. adults would not want to use AI chatbots for mental health support, with concerns about their standalone effectiveness; 46% say these chatbots should only supplement therapist care.
37% believe AI use in health and medicine would worsen health record security, while 22% think it would improve security, indicating significant public concern about data privacy in AI applications.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
