Healthcare organizations today rely heavily on many third-party vendors—from billing companies and electronic health record (EHR) providers to front-office automation services like Simbo AI, which automates phone answering to improve patient engagement. While these partnerships increase efficiency, they also bring concerns:
Given these factors, healthcare organizations need to move from periodic audits or one-time assessments to a continuous, proactive approach to vendor risk management.
Third-party vendors expose healthcare organizations to various risk types. Administrators and IT managers must understand these to manage them properly:
Addressing these risks requires ongoing identification, assessment, and mitigation efforts.
To improve vendor security through continuous monitoring, healthcare organizations should set up a clear process with these practices:
Keep an accurate, updated list of all third-party vendors. This should include:
Because organizations often interact with hundreds of vendors, including those with subcontractors, visibility into the full ecosystem helps tailor monitoring intensity effectively.
Not all vendors carry the same risk. Organizations should score vendors based on:
This risk-based tiering helps focus resources on high-impact vendors.
Before onboarding, vendors should be carefully evaluated through:
This establishes a baseline for ongoing monitoring.
Modern monitoring platforms let organizations track vendor cybersecurity in real time. These tools detect issues like:
Unlike annual audits that provide a snapshot, automated tools offer ongoing visibility and fast alerts, allowing for early responses.
Monitoring relevant metrics helps track vendor reliability and trends. Useful indicators include:
Regular review of KRIs enables timely adjustments to risk strategies.
Clear communication encourages prompt reporting of security incidents and collaborative risk reduction. This helps ensure vendors follow contract requirements and respond quickly to monitoring alerts.
Organizations should plan steps to limit exposure when vendors fail or are compromised, such as:
Proper offboarding reduces lingering vulnerabilities.
Artificial intelligence and automation add capabilities to vendor risk management programs. They support scaling efforts, quicker detection, and more precise decision-making.
AI-Powered Continuous Monitoring: Machine learning can analyze large amounts of vendor data—including security reports, patch statuses, access logs, and threat feeds—to spot anomalies or threats faster than manual reviews. Real-time risk scores help prioritize vendors that need attention.
Automated Risk Assessments and Reporting: AI platforms create risk profiles and compliance reports automatically, lowering administrative tasks on often understaffed IT teams.
Integration with Security Frameworks: AI tools can connect with internal Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) systems. This centralizes vendor risk data within broader security operations, improving response capabilities.
Workflow Automation for Vendor Risk Operations: Automated workflows simplify onboarding and ongoing assessments, helping organizations manage growing vendor networks. Platforms like Censinet RiskOps reduce time and resource demands on staff.
Proactive Threat Intelligence Sharing: AI platforms often include threat intelligence from global sources. This provides early warnings about vulnerabilities that could affect vendor software or services, enabling prompt patches or other responses.
Services such as Simbo AI’s phone automation benefit from these risk management processes by maintaining security standards and regulatory compliance consistently.
Recent updates to regulations in the US highlight the need for continuous oversight of vendor risks:
Providers must have vendor programs capable of producing audit-ready evidence of continuous monitoring. Automated and AI-powered tools that track compliance in real time are important.
Healthcare administrators and IT managers often face limits on staff and expertise to manage large numbers of vendors dynamically. Continuous monitoring platforms with AI and automation lower manual work such as questionnaire distribution, risk scoring, and reporting.
Centralized dashboards provide risk visualization, helping small teams manage complex third-party ecosystems. Moving from reactive to preventive security helps reduce downtime and breaches, which benefits patient care.
Not all third-party risks are equal. Smaller vendors can pose high risks as criminals often target them to access larger systems. Best practices for 2025 recommend:
A risk-based approach helps healthcare organizations maintain compliance, reduce financial exposure, and protect patients.
These examples show how better visibility and frameworks improve vendor management and operational resilience.
Healthcare providers, administrators, and IT managers should recognize that third-party risks are dynamic. Continuous, AI-supported monitoring provides better protection against evolving cyber threats. Efficient workflows, clear risk metrics, compliance tracking, and real-time incident response are essential to safeguarding patient data and maintaining healthcare services.
Third-party security refers to the measures organizations use to ensure that vendors and service providers maintain adequate security to protect sensitive data and IT systems, minimizing risks posed by external entities.
Common risks include cybersecurity risk (data breaches), compliance risk (regulatory violations), reputational risk (damage by association), financial risk (loss from vendor failures), operational risk (service disruptions), and strategic risk (misaligned goals).
Organizations can conduct risk assessments using questionnaires or due diligence processes to evaluate vendors’ cybersecurity practices, compliance with regulations, and potential risks associated with their services.
A third-party risk assessment helps understand, quantify, and mitigate risks posed by vendors, ensuring informed decisions about partnerships and compliance with industry regulations.
Acceptable levels of third-party risk depend on the organization’s strategic goals, regulatory environment, and financial capacity, with input from various stakeholders across the organization.
Fourth-party risks arise from subcontractors utilized by third-party vendors, which can also pose significant risks. Organizations should investigate how their vendors manage these relationships.
Continuous monitoring ensures that organizations maintain an updated risk profile, allowing them to respond to any changes in vendors’ security postures or new emerging threats.
Key metrics include the number of vendors without current risk assessments, pass rates for security questionnaires, compliance issues, incident response times, and overall risk mitigation effectiveness.
A vendor exit strategy should outline procedures for removing access to IT resources, deauthorizing accounts, retrieving equipment, and ensuring that any data handled by the vendor is disposed of properly.
Organizations can enhance vendor security by requiring minimum security standards in contracts, conducting regular audits, and ensuring vendors have effective incident response and disaster recovery plans.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
