Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are tools that patients use to report their health, symptoms, mood, and how well they function each day. They answer questions without a doctor’s interpretation. PROMs give doctors different information that can help make better decisions, customize treatments, and improve talks between patients and healthcare workers.
One example is a program treating spinal cord injuries in the United States. This program tried to use PROMs linked with electronic health records. It showed how complicated it can be to start using PROMs and gave important lessons about the things that help or block their use.
Staff Resistance and Institutional Inertia
Some healthcare workers do not want to add PROM tasks because they worry it will take away time from caring for patients. In the spinal cord injury program, some doctors saw PROMs as extra work instead of something useful.
Procedural and Workflow Challenges
Adding PROMs to current work routines needs good planning and sometimes changes how jobs are done. For example, not having clear steps on how to collect and use PROM data made progress slow. Over 60% of cancer care workers said not having set workflows was a big problem.
Technological Limitations
Many clinics struggle because their computer systems don’t support PROMs well. Over 70% of cancer doctors worldwide said technology problems make it hard to adopt PROMs. This is even a problem in some U.S. clinics because of old systems or costs.
Insufficient Training and Continuing Support
Staff need training to use PROMs well but often do not get enough. One study found that even when hospitals gave digital tools and a clear plan, PROM use stayed low. Continuous education and encouragement are important so staff know how PROMs help patients and their work.
Patient Engagement and Burden
PATIENTS are key to PROMs but do not always take part. At one hospital, less than half of patients filled out PROMs. Patients may be tired of surveys or think they take too much time. Making PROMs shorter and explaining why they matter can help more patients respond.
Leadership Support and Dedicated Resources
Strong support from leaders helps provide enough staff and technology. In the spinal injury project, having staff ‘Implementation Champions’ helped keep the work going when problems came up.
Detailed Upfront Planning and Workflow Design
Good planning that involves many hospital departments helps make PROMs fit smoothly into daily care. Clear roles and steps mean PROM work is part of normal care, not extra tasks.
Training and Motivation for Healthcare Professionals
Regular education for doctors, nurses, and students about how to use PROMs is needed. The Erasmus Medical Center study showed that training at all levels helps build habits around PROM use.
Combining Generic and Disease-Specific PROMs
Using both general PROM questions and ones for specific illnesses helps meet different patient and clinic needs. This improves how useful PROMs are.
Patient Activation and Support
Helping patients understand how their information improves care, and making PROMs easier to complete, can help increase participation.
Even though many studies come from Europe and other countries, their lessons apply to the U.S. The spinal cord injury rehab study took place in the U.S. and is relevant to American clinics.
Hospital leaders and IT managers in the U.S. can learn these points:
Planning is Essential: Work closely with IT early to connect PROMs with hospital electronic records. Expect the process to take longer than planned because of rules and resistance.
Role Clarification and Staffing: Assign people just to collect and manage PROM data to avoid adding pressure on doctors and nurses.
Training Strategy: Set up education for all healthcare workers to show how PROM data helps in care.
Involvement of Champions: Have leaders and advocates who support PROMs and help solve problems.
Patient-Centered Design: Use easy-to-use tech tools so patients of all backgrounds can complete PROMs without quitting.
Funding and Resources: Make sure money and resources are steady to keep PROM programs running.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation can help fix some problems in PROM use.
Automation of Data Collection and Processing
AI can send PROM surveys to patients by phone, email, or online portals. It can also read answers using natural language processing and score surveys automatically, so no one has to do it by hand.
Improved Patient Interaction Through AI-Powered Phone Systems
Some companies use AI for phone answering in healthcare. This helps reduce staff work and encourages patients by reminding them or setting PROM appointments.
Integration with Electronic Health Records
AI can help PROM data appear in patients’ medical records. It can also create alerts or give doctors advice based on PROM answers to act quickly on patient needs.
Reducing Clinician Burden
By automating PROM tasks like sending surveys and tracking responses, AI lowers the time doctors and nurses spend on extra tasks. This is important because staff often resist PROMs if they think it slows down care.
Data Analytics and Population Health Insights
AI can look at PROM data across many patients to find patterns. This helps improve overall care quality and supports payment plans based on patient outcomes.
Collaboration with Technology Partners: Work with companies that know healthcare AI to improve communication and manage PROM data using phone bots and automated messages.
Staff Training on New Technologies: Teach staff how to use AI tools for PROMs and understand why they are important.
Patient Engagement Strategies: Use AI to send personalized reminders that encourage patients to finish PROM surveys, reducing survey tiredness and missing information.
Secure and Compliant Systems: Make sure AI tools meet healthcare rules like HIPAA to keep patient data private.
Monitoring and Feedback Loops: Regularly check how PROM workflows and AI are working and adjust them based on comments from staff and patients.
Only about 25% of cancer care workers worldwide use PROMs for most patients regularly.
They say technology problems and weak work routines are main hurdles.
Doctors find PROMs disrupt patient visits more than nurses do.
These points show cancer clinics need to use AI and better workflows to lower staff workload while keeping good patient care.
PROMs are standardized instruments that capture patients’ perceptions of their health status, quality of life, and treatment outcomes from their own perspective.
The main objective was to identify barriers and supports for using PROMs, develop an implementation strategy, and evaluate its effects on team communication within an inpatient rehabilitation setting.
Challenges included procedural issues, institutional inertia, and reluctance from clinical staff to assume new responsibilities surrounding PROMs integration into the EHR.
Essential strategies included detailed upfront planning, cooperation with the Information Systems department, and the identification of key players and Implementation Champions.
The project aimed to evaluate and improve team communication regarding patient feedback and care, although specifics were not detailed in the text.
Grant funding supported the coding necessary for integrating PROMs into the EHR, but competing institutional priorities delayed the project’s progress.
Facilitators include leadership support, dedicated resources, training for staff, and established workflows that incorporate PROMs into routine practice.
Integrating PROMs enhances patient-centered care, improves assessment of treatment effectiveness, and aligns clinical practice with patient feedback.
Lessons included the importance of planning, stakeholder engagement, and iterative feedback to adapt the integration process effectively.
PROMs can be aggregated for population health data analysis, influencing quality improvement and healthcare policy decisions.