AI systems in healthcare rely a lot on data. This includes electronic health records (EHRs), images for diagnosis, lab results, and information from patient devices like wearables. Unlike old healthcare tools, AI needs big and varied datasets that are often kept in one place to work well. This need for a lot of data makes patient health information more open to hacking or misuse.
One issue is that AI apps sometimes use data held by private tech companies, which work with public health groups. For example, DeepMind, owned by Google, worked with a London health trust and shared patient data without clear permission. These kinds of deals can put healthcare providers at risk for problems with data control and privacy rules.
In the U.S., most adults do not feel okay sharing their health data with tech companies. Surveys show that only 11% of Americans would share health data with tech firms, while 72% trust their doctors with this information. This difference in trust means healthcare managers must make sure AI systems are clear, safe, and respect patient rights.
Rules are very important for keeping patient data safe in AI use. In the U.S., HIPAA is the main law that protects patient health information. But HIPAA was made before AI became common. It has limits when dealing with new AI issues.
AI brings hard problems, like the “black box” issue. This means that AI’s decision process is often unclear. This makes it hard for doctors to fully check or watch AI results. Also, old ways to hide identity in data are not always good now because AI can find who data belongs to, even if names are removed. Studies show that 85.6% of adults in some hidden datasets can be identified again using new methods.
Because of this, rules need to grow along with AI technology. The European Union’s GDPR is an important global rule about data privacy. It affects U.S. rules by raising ideas about consent, less data use, and patient control. The U.S. does not have a national law like GDPR yet. But states like California have passed laws like the CCPA, and the federal government plans to make new rules focusing on AI and privacy. These laws want more openness and strict controls.
Medical managers in the U.S. must make sure their AI systems follow current federal and state privacy laws like HIPAA and CCPA. They also must get ready for new laws that focus on AI rules. Companies should work with legal and compliance experts to handle these changes well.
Patient consent is very important to protect health data privacy. Normally, doctors get permission from patients before treatment and using health data. AI brings new problems because data collected for one thing might be used for others—like training AI models or research.
Patients may not always know how their data is used in AI. For example, trust went down after cases where data was shared without good consent, like the DeepMind-NHS case. To respect patient control, healthcare groups need systems where patients can give permission again and understand their choices. Patients should also be able to stop sharing if they want.
Consent management tools help clinics keep track of what patients agree to, making sure data use follows patient wishes and laws. Clear talks with patients about AI risks and benefits build trust and follow ethical rules.
Even with good consent and rules, hiding patient identity in data is a top way to keep privacy in AI. Old ways remove obvious info like names and social security numbers. But new AI can sometimes figure out who is who, even after data is hidden, with a success rate of up to 85.6% in some cases.
To fight this, healthcare groups should use better ways to hide data:
Some places also use generative models that create fake but similar patient data. This fake data looks like real data but is not connected to real people. It lowers privacy risks. Fake data cannot fully replace real data but is helpful for testing and training AI with less risk.
A new method called Federated Learning helps protect privacy. It allows AI models to learn from data kept in many different places without moving the raw data. Each healthcare provider trains the AI locally and only shares encrypted updates. This lowers the risk of data leaks since sensitive info does not leave the local systems.
This method fits HIPAA rules and helps hospitals work together without sharing all data. It also helps with problems like different computer records across hospitals by letting AI learn without sending data around.
Other tools like Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC) and Homomorphic Encryption (HE) keep data safe by letting AI do calculations on encrypted data without turning it back into plain data. This keeps patient data secret even during AI use.
Healthcare managers and IT teams should think about adding these privacy tools to their systems, especially when working with outside partners or tech firms.
AI trained on uneven or limited data can copy existing health gaps. It may give poor advice to groups that are not well represented. Bias comes from missing or incomplete records, lack of diverse data, or AI limits.
To lower bias, healthcare groups should:
Fixing bias is not just a technical issue but a duty to give fair care to all patients.
AI can also help automate tasks for privacy and rules, cutting down human mistakes and workload.
Automation can include:
Using AI in privacy workflows can make processes faster and improve control over patient data.
Because patients often do not trust tech companies with their data, healthcare groups should build open policies and strong management.
This includes:
Healthcare managers and IT teams in the U.S. are working in a tough setting where AI brings both help and data privacy challenges. Good data protection means following laws that change with AI, respecting patient consent, using strong ways to hide identity, and applying privacy tools like federated learning. Automating privacy work with AI is also key to guard sensitive data.
Protecting patient data is not only required by law but needed to keep trust in AI healthcare. By using full data protection methods, healthcare groups can use AI safely to improve care while lowering privacy risks.
The key concerns include the access, use, and control of patient data by private entities, potential privacy breaches from algorithmic systems, and the risk of reidentifying anonymized patient data.
AI technologies are prone to specific errors and biases and often operate as ‘black boxes,’ making it challenging for healthcare professionals to supervise their decision-making processes.
The ‘black box’ problem refers to the opacity of AI algorithms, where their internal workings and reasoning for conclusions are not easily understood by human observers.
Private companies may prioritize profit over patient privacy, potentially compromising data security and increasing the risk of unauthorized access and privacy breaches.
To effectively govern AI, regulatory frameworks must be dynamic, addressing the rapid advancements of technologies while ensuring patient agency, consent, and robust data protection measures.
Public-private partnerships can facilitate the development and deployment of AI technologies, but they raise concerns about patient consent, data control, and privacy protections.
Implementing stringent data protection regulations, ensuring informed consent for data usage, and employing advanced anonymization techniques are essential steps to safeguard patient data.
Emerging AI techniques have demonstrated the ability to reidentify individuals from supposedly anonymized datasets, raising significant concerns about the effectiveness of current data protection measures.
Generative data involves creating realistic but synthetic patient data that does not connect to real individuals, reducing the reliance on actual patient data and mitigating privacy risks.
Public trust issues stem from concerns regarding privacy breaches, past violations of patient data rights by corporations, and a general apprehension about sharing sensitive health information with tech companies.